dc.contributor.author |
Hamade R.F. |
dc.contributor.author |
Artail H.A. |
dc.contributor.author |
Jaber M.Y. |
dc.contributor.editor |
|
dc.date |
2011 |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-10-04T11:15:49Z |
dc.date.available |
2017-10-04T11:15:49Z |
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
dc.identifier |
10.1016/j.cie.2011.04.024 |
dc.identifier.isbn |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
03608352 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10938/14840 |
dc.description.abstract |
The notion that 'attitude drives behavior' manifests itself in a variety of ways in educational and occupational settings. As applied to CAD competence development, industrial training of novice CAD users on their way to becoming competent CAD users consume a lot of corporate resources. This paper is the third paper in the line of research that attempts to answer the question having to do with what it takes to make a competent CAD user. Specifically, we examine the CAD-specific factors revolving around the trainees' willingness-to-learn CAD. These factors are analyzed in two stages. At the start of the training, trainees' initial attitude towards CAD is established by means of a short questionnaire. Afterwards, throughout the training, trainees' behavior (online and offline practice) is gauged and, in turn, a relation is established to illustrate how this practice leads to the development of CAD-specific skills. For this purpose, another short questionnaire was utilized. Strong correlations were established relating the trainees' CAD-specific behavior with the CAD-specific outcomes of learning CAD syntax. Furthermore, and in order to assess the quality of the trainees' learning of CAD, overall competence was monitored throughout the study via performance measures that describe the time it took the trainees to build test models (speed), which reflects upon the ability to learn the syntax of the CAD tool (declarative knowledge). The sophistication of the models is also used as another measure. Correlating the trainees' character attributes with these assessed measures, it was found that the stronger is the trainees' will to learn CAD, the stronger is the likelihood to learn faster. Perhaps more importantly, trainees with initial favorable attitude toward CAD were shown to develop increasingly positive behavior that manifested through additional practice and other forms of visible effort. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
dc.format.extent |
|
dc.format.extent |
Pages: (709-720) |
dc.language |
English |
dc.publisher |
OXFORD |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Publication Name: Computers and Industrial Engineering; Publication Year: 2011; Volume: 61; no. 3; Pages: (709-720); |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
|
dc.relation.uri |
|
dc.source |
Scopus |
dc.subject.other |
|
dc.title |
A study of the impact of the willingness-to-learn of CAD novice users on their competence development |
dc.type |
Article |
dc.contributor.affiliation |
Hamade, R.F., Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon |
dc.contributor.affiliation |
Artail, H.A., Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon |
dc.contributor.affiliation |
Jaber, M.Y., Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto M5B 2K3, Canada |
dc.contributor.authorAddress |
Jaber, M.Y.; Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto M5B 2K3, Canada; email: mjaber@ryerson.ca |
dc.contributor.authorCorporate |
University: American University of Beirut; Faculty: Faculty of Engineering and Architecture; Department: Mechanical Engineering; |
dc.contributor.authorDepartment |
Mechanical Engineering |
dc.contributor.authorDivision |
|
dc.contributor.authorEmail |
rhamade@aub.edu.lb; hartail@aub.edu.lb; mjaber@ryerson.ca |
dc.contributor.faculty |
Faculty of Engineering and Architecture |
dc.contributor.authorInitials |
Hamade, RF |
dc.contributor.authorInitials |
Artail, HA |
dc.contributor.authorInitials |
Jaber, MY |
dc.contributor.authorOrcidID |
|
dc.contributor.authorReprintAddress |
Jaber, MY (reprint author), Ryerson Univ, Dept Mech and Ind Engn, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada. |
dc.contributor.authorResearcherID |
|
dc.contributor.authorUniversity |
American University of Beirut |
dc.description.cited |
Ajzen I., 1988, ATTITUDES PERSONALIT; Barrett JH, 2005, INT J IND ERGONOM, V35, P871, DOI 10.1016-j.ergon.2004.12.004; Colquitt JA, 2000, J APPL PSYCHOL, V85, P678, DOI 10.1037--0021-9010.85.5.678; Hamade RF, 2009, COMPUT IND ENG, V56, P1510, DOI 10.1016-j.cie.2008.09.025; Hamade RF, 2007, COMPUT EDUC, V49, P640, DOI 10.1016-j.compedu.2005.11.009; Hamade RF, 2005, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, V19, P305, DOI 10.1207-s15327590ijhc1903_2; Hamade RF, 2010, J ENG DESIGN, V21, P561, DOI 10.1080-09544820802409289; Hamade RF, 2008, COMPUT AIDED DESIGN, V40, P262, DOI 10.1016-j.cad.2007.11.001; Jaber M.Y., 2011, LEARNING CURVES THEO; MCDERMOTT CM, 1995, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V42, P410, DOI 10.1109-17.482090; MCGRANN RTR, 2006, J EDUC TECHNOL SYST, V34, P165, DOI 10.2190-2B89-MRNQ-WD57-EU48; MURPHY M, 2007, CADALYST 0101, P36; NOE RA, 1986, ACAD MANAGE REV, V11, P736, DOI 10.2307-258393; Robinson G, 2007, COMPUT AIDED DESIGN, V39, P245, DOI 10.1016-j.cad.2006.12.001; Salas E, 2001, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V52, P471, DOI 10.1146-annurev.psych.52.1.471; Schumann J., 1996, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, P35, DOI DOI 10.1145-238386.238398; VANDERHEIDEN GH, 1984, P 21 C DES AUT DAC 8, P220; Wright T. P., 1936, J AERONAUT SCI, V3, P122 |
dc.description.citedCount |
3 |
dc.description.citedTotWOSCount |
0 |
dc.description.citedWOSCount |
0 |
dc.format.extentCount |
12 |
dc.identifier.articleNo |
|
dc.identifier.coden |
CINDD |
dc.identifier.pubmedID |
|
dc.identifier.scopusID |
80053180575 |
dc.identifier.url |
|
dc.publisher.address |
THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND |
dc.relation.ispartofConference |
|
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceCode |
|
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceDate |
|
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceHosting |
|
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceLoc |
|
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceSponsor |
|
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceTitle |
|
dc.relation.ispartofFundingAgency |
|
dc.relation.ispartOfISOAbbr |
Comput. Ind. Eng. |
dc.relation.ispartOfIssue |
3 |
dc.relation.ispartOfPart |
|
dc.relation.ispartofPubTitle |
Computers and Industrial Engineering |
dc.relation.ispartofPubTitleAbbr |
Comput Ind Eng |
dc.relation.ispartOfSpecialIssue |
|
dc.relation.ispartOfSuppl |
|
dc.relation.ispartOfVolume |
61 |
dc.source.ID |
WOS:000296219800027 |
dc.type.publication |
Journal |
dc.subject.otherAuthKeyword |
CAD |
dc.subject.otherAuthKeyword |
Evaluation methodologies |
dc.subject.otherAuthKeyword |
Post-secondary education |
dc.subject.otherChemCAS |
|
dc.subject.otherIndex |
CAD tool |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Competence development |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Corporate resources |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Declarative knowledge |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Evaluation methodologies |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Industrial training |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Novice user |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Offline |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Performance measure |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Postsecondary education |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Strong correlation |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Test models |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Two stage |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Surveys |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Syntactics |
dc.subject.otherIndex |
Computer aided design |
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus |
ATTRIBUTES |
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus |
ATTITUDES |
dc.subject.otherWOS |
Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications |
dc.subject.otherWOS |
Engineering, Industrial |