AUB ScholarWorks

Attitude of women with IVF and spontaneous pregnancies towards prenatal screening

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Abu-Musa A.A.
dc.contributor.author Nassar A.H.
dc.contributor.author Usta I.M.
dc.contributor.editor
dc.date Nov-2008
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-05T15:47:05Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-05T15:47:05Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier 10.1093/humrep/den291
dc.identifier.isbn
dc.identifier.issn 02681161
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10938/18619
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Factors influencing a pregnant woman's decision to accept prenatal testing are largely undefined. Our study aimed to compare the acceptance rate of prenatal diagnosis in women who conceived through IVF or ICSI (cases) with that of women who conceived spontaneously (controls). METHODS: Retrospective chart review in Lebanon of all primiparas carrying singletons who were offered prenatal testing (triple screen-amniocentesis) from 2004-2007. The influence of IVF-ICSI on the acceptance of prenatal screening was evaluated. RESULTS: 336 pregnant women were offered prenatal testing (120 cases and 216 controls). Cases were less likely to perform prenatal testing compared with controls (52.5 versus 72.7percent; P 0.001). The rate of utilization of prenatal testing was independent of the infertility cause. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that women who conceived through IVF-ICSI [odds ratio (OR) 0.427, 95percent confidence interval (CI) 0.252-0.724], those ≥35 years old (OR 0.184, 95percent CI 0.102-0.329) and lower socioeconomic class (OR 0.339, 95percent CI 0.197-0.584) were less likely to perform triple screen test, and women who conceived through IVF-ICSI (OR 0.354, 95percent CI 0.131-0.958) and those of lower socioeconomic class (OR 0.113, 95percent CI 0.033-0.403) were less likely to perform amniocentesis. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant difference in acceptance rate of prenatal diagnostic testing between women who conceived through IVF-ICSI and those who conceived spontaneously. Women who conceived through IVF-ICSI were less likely to opt for prenatal diagnosis even after controlling for confounding variables. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved.
dc.format.extent
dc.format.extent Pages: (2438-2443)
dc.language English
dc.publisher OXFORD
dc.relation.ispartof Publication Name: Human Reproduction; Publication Year: 2008; Volume: 23; no. 11; Pages: (2438-2443);
dc.relation.ispartofseries
dc.relation.uri
dc.source Scopus
dc.subject.other
dc.title Attitude of women with IVF and spontaneous pregnancies towards prenatal screening
dc.type Article
dc.contributor.affiliation Abu-Musa, A.A., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO Box: 113-6044-6A, Beirut, Lebanon
dc.contributor.affiliation Nassar, A.H., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO Box: 113-6044-6A, Beirut, Lebanon
dc.contributor.affiliation Usta, I.M., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO Box: 113-6044-6A, Beirut, Lebanon
dc.contributor.authorAddress Abu-Musa, A. A.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO Box: 113-6044-6A, Beirut, Lebanon; email: aa06@aub.edu.lb
dc.contributor.authorCorporate University: American University of Beirut Medical Center; Faculty: Faculty of Medicine; Department: Obstetrics and Gynecology;
dc.contributor.authorDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.contributor.authorDivision
dc.contributor.authorEmail aa06@aub.edu.lb
dc.contributor.authorFaculty Faculty of Medicine
dc.contributor.authorInitials Abu-Musa, AA
dc.contributor.authorInitials Nassar, AH
dc.contributor.authorInitials Usta, IM
dc.contributor.authorOrcidID
dc.contributor.authorReprintAddress Abu-Musa, AA (reprint author), Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet and Gynecol, POB 113-6044-6A, Beirut, Lebanon.
dc.contributor.authorResearcherID
dc.contributor.authorUniversity American University of Beirut Medical Center
dc.description.cited *ACOG, 2001, ACOG PRACT B PREN DI; ADAM S, 1993, J MED GENET, V30, P549, DOI 10.1136-jmg.30.7.549; Alsulaiman A, 2006, PRENATAL DIAG, V26, P1010, DOI 10.1002-pd.1544; Azar M, 2006, J TRANSCULT NURS, V17, P375, DOI 10.1177-1043659606291550; Cameron C, 2003, J MED ETHICS, V29, P90, DOI 10.1136-jme.29.2.90; Chamayou S, 1998, HUM REPROD, V13, P1936, DOI 10.1093-humrep-13.7.1936; Cohen CB, 1996, HASTINGS CENT REP, V26, P19, DOI 10.2307-3528572; CORCHIA C, 1995, PRENATAL DIAG, V15, P535, DOI 10.1002-pd.1970150606; Eldahdah LT, 2007, PRENATAL DIAG, V27, P525, DOI 10.1002-pd.1721; Elimian A, 2003, PRENATAL DIAG, V23, P501, DOI 10.1002-pd.633; Eugster A, 1999, SOC SCI MED, V48, P575, DOI 10.1016-S0277-9536(98)00386-4; EVANS MI, 1993, FETAL DIAGN THER, V8, P70; GARDNER RJM, 1996, OXFORD MONOGRAPHS ME, V29, P336; HALLIDAY J, 1995, LANCET, V345, P704, DOI 10.1016-S0140-6736(95)90872-2; Hansen M, 2005, HUM REPROD, V20, P328, DOI 10.1093-humrep-deh593; JORDE LB, 1995, MED GENETICS, V59; Katz MG, 2002, PRENATAL DIAG, V22, P1117, DOI 10.1002-pd.498; Kuppermann M, 1996, OBSTET GYNECOL, V87, P675, DOI 10.1016-0029-7844(96)00017-8; Mavrou A, 1998, PRENATAL DIAG, V18, P349, DOI 10.1002-(SICI)1097-0223(199804)18:4349::AID-PD2723.0.CO;2-D; McMahon CA, 1997, HUM REPROD, V12, P176, DOI 10.1093-humrep-12.1.176; Nassar AH, 2004, GYNECOL OBSTET INVES, V58, P100, DOI 10.1159-000078793; Pryor JL, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P534, DOI 10.1056-NEJM199702203360802; Ragni G, 2005, HUM REPROD, V20, P1286, DOI 10.1093-humrep-deh788; Schover LR, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P2461; Schover LR, 1998, HUM REPROD, V13, P862, DOI 10.1093-humrep-13.4.862; TYMSTRA T, 1991, PRENATAL DIAG, V11, P893, DOI 10.1002-pd.1970111203; WERTZ DC, 1992, AM J HUM GENET, V50, P1077; WilkinsHaug LE, 1997, FERTIL STERIL, V67, P612, DOI 10.1016-S0015-0282(97)81352-0; Zahed L, 2002, PRENATAL DIAG, V22, P880, DOI 10.1002-pd.429; Zahed L, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P1109; Zhu JL, 2006, BRIT MED J, V333, P679, DOI 10.1136-bmj.38919.495718.AE
dc.description.citedCount 5
dc.description.citedTotWOSCount 5
dc.description.citedWOSCount 5
dc.format.extentCount 6
dc.identifier.articleNo
dc.identifier.coden HUREE
dc.identifier.pubmedID 18664471
dc.identifier.scopusID 54149095979
dc.identifier.url
dc.publisher.address GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
dc.relation.ispartofConference
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceCode
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceDate
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceHosting
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceLoc
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceSponsor
dc.relation.ispartofConferenceTitle
dc.relation.ispartofFundingAgency
dc.relation.ispartOfISOAbbr Hum. Reprod.
dc.relation.ispartOfIssue 11
dc.relation.ispartOfPart
dc.relation.ispartofPubTitle Human Reproduction
dc.relation.ispartofPubTitleAbbr Hum. Reprod.
dc.relation.ispartOfSpecialIssue
dc.relation.ispartOfSuppl
dc.relation.ispartOfVolume 23
dc.source.ID WOS:000260142900006
dc.type.publication Journal
dc.subject.otherAuthKeyword Amniocentesis
dc.subject.otherAuthKeyword IVF
dc.subject.otherAuthKeyword Spontaneous pregnancy
dc.subject.otherAuthKeyword Triple screen
dc.subject.otherChemCAS
dc.subject.otherIndex acceptance
dc.subject.otherIndex adult
dc.subject.otherIndex amniocentesis
dc.subject.otherIndex anxiety
dc.subject.otherIndex article
dc.subject.otherIndex attitude to pregnancy
dc.subject.otherIndex behavior
dc.subject.otherIndex chi square test
dc.subject.otherIndex confidence interval
dc.subject.otherIndex controlled study
dc.subject.otherIndex female
dc.subject.otherIndex fertilization in vitro
dc.subject.otherIndex financial management
dc.subject.otherIndex human
dc.subject.otherIndex infertility
dc.subject.otherIndex intracytoplasmic sperm injection
dc.subject.otherIndex Lebanon
dc.subject.otherIndex logistic regression analysis
dc.subject.otherIndex medical record review
dc.subject.otherIndex multivariate logistic regression analysis
dc.subject.otherIndex parthenogenesis
dc.subject.otherIndex pregnant woman
dc.subject.otherIndex prenatal screening
dc.subject.otherIndex primipara
dc.subject.otherIndex religion
dc.subject.otherIndex retrospective study
dc.subject.otherIndex socioeconomics
dc.subject.otherIndex Student t test
dc.subject.otherIndex Adult
dc.subject.otherIndex Amniocentesis
dc.subject.otherIndex Attitude to Health
dc.subject.otherIndex Case-Control Studies
dc.subject.otherIndex Female
dc.subject.otherIndex Fertilization in Vitro
dc.subject.otherIndex Humans
dc.subject.otherIndex Lebanon
dc.subject.otherIndex Odds Ratio
dc.subject.otherIndex Pregnancy
dc.subject.otherIndex Prenatal Diagnosis
dc.subject.otherIndex Regression Analysis
dc.subject.otherIndex Retrospective Studies
dc.subject.otherIndex Social Class
dc.subject.otherIndex Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus LEBANON
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus AMNIOCENTESIS
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus COUPLES
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus RISK
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus PREFERENCES
dc.subject.otherKeywordPlus ACCEPTANCE
dc.subject.otherWOS Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subject.otherWOS Reproductive Biology


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search AUB ScholarWorks


Browse

My Account