AUB ScholarWorks

Nonculturability Might Underestimate the Occurrence of Campylobacter in Broiler Litter

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kassem, Issmat I.
dc.contributor.author Helmy, Yosra A.
dc.contributor.author Kathayat, Dipak
dc.contributor.author Candelero-Rueda, Rosario Adriana
dc.contributor.author Kumar, Anand
dc.contributor.author Deblais, Loic
dc.contributor.author Huang, Huangchi
dc.contributor.author Sahin, Orhan
dc.contributor.author Zhang, Qijing
dc.contributor.author Rajashekara, Gireesh
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-24T11:18:59Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-24T11:18:59Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10938/24766
dc.description.abstract We investigated the contribution of litter to the occurrence of Campylobacter on three broiler farms, which were known to have low (LO) and high (HI-A and HI-B) Campylobacter prevalence. For this purpose, we collected litter samples (n = 288) during and after two rearing cycles from each farm. We evaluated the occurrence of Campylobacter (using selective enrichment and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction [q-PCR] analysis) in the litter samples as well as the litter's pH and moisture content. Ceca from each flock (n = 144) were harvested at slaughter age and used to quantify Campylobacter colony-forming units (CFUs). Campylobacter was only retrieved from 7 litter samples that were collected from HI-A and HI-B during the growing period, but no Campylobacter was isolated from LO farms. The q-PCR analysis detected Campylobacter in pooled litter samples from all three farms. However, in litter collected during the same rotation, Campylobacter levels were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in HI-A and HI-B litter samples in comparison to those in LO. Cecal samples from HI-A and HI-B yielded relatively high numbers of Campylobacter CFUs, which were undetectable in LO samples. Litter's pH and moisture did not affect the overall occurrence of Campylobacter in litter and ceca on any of the farms. Our data suggest that Campylobacter was generally more abundant in litter that was collected from farms with highly colonized flocks. Therefore, better approaches for assessing the occurrence of Campylobacter in litter might be warranted in order to reduce the dissemination of these pathogens on and off poultry farms. Copyright © 2017 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Mary Ann Liebert Inc.
dc.relation.ispartof Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
dc.source Scopus
dc.subject Broilers
dc.subject Campylobacter
dc.subject Chickens
dc.subject Control
dc.subject Food safety
dc.subject Litter
dc.subject Moisture
dc.subject Ph
dc.subject Animals
dc.subject Campylobacter infections
dc.subject Foodborne diseases
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Hydrogen-ion concentration
dc.subject Poultry
dc.subject Poultry diseases
dc.subject Prevalence
dc.subject Article
dc.subject Bacterium culture
dc.subject Bacterium detection
dc.subject Bacterium isolation
dc.subject Broiler
dc.subject Colony forming unit
dc.subject Controlled study
dc.subject Enrichment culture
dc.subject Nonhuman
dc.subject Priority journal
dc.subject Quantitative analysis
dc.subject Real time polymerase chain reaction
dc.subject Rearing
dc.subject Animal
dc.subject Bird disease
dc.subject Campylobacteriosis
dc.subject Chicken
dc.subject Food poisoning
dc.subject Genetics
dc.subject Human
dc.subject Isolation and purification
dc.subject Microbiology
dc.title Nonculturability Might Underestimate the Occurrence of Campylobacter in Broiler Litter
dc.type Article
dc.contributor.department Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences
dc.contributor.faculty Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences (FAFS)
dc.contributor.institution American University of Beirut
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2017.2279
dc.identifier.pmid 28622473
dc.identifier.eid 2-s2.0-85027030669


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search AUB ScholarWorks


Browse

My Account