GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health

dc.contributor.authorSchunëmann, Holger J.
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Reem A.
dc.contributor.authorBrožek, Jan L.
dc.contributor.authorSantesso, Nancy A.
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Coello, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Guyatt H.
dc.contributor.authorSchölten, Rob J.P.M.
dc.contributor.authorLangendam, Miranda W.
dc.contributor.authorLeeflang, Mariska M.G.
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Jasvinder A.
dc.contributor.authorMeerpohl, Joerg J.
dc.contributor.authorHultcrantz, Monica
dc.contributor.authorBossuyt, Patrick M.M.
dc.contributor.authorOxman, Andrew David
dc.contributor.authorLange, Stefan F.
dc.contributor.authorParmelli, Elena
dc.contributor.authorMoberg, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorRosenbaum, Sarah Ellen
dc.contributor.authorBrignardello-Petersen, Romina
dc.contributor.authorWiercioch, Wojtek
dc.contributor.authorDavoli, M.
dc.contributor.authorNowak, Artur J.
dc.contributor.authorDietl, Bart
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:48:55Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:48:55Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To describe the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) interactive evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks for tests and test strategies for clinical, public health, or coverage decisions. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: As part of the GRADE Working Group's DECIDE project, we conducted workshops, user testing with systematic review authors, guideline developers and other decision makers, and piloted versions of the EtD framework. RESULTS: EtD frameworks for tests share the structure, explicitness, and transparency of other EtD frameworks. They require specifying the purpose of the test, linked or related management, and the key outcomes of concern for different test results and subsequent management. The EtD criteria address test accuracy and assessments of the certainty of the additional evidence necessary for decision making. When there is no direct evidence of test effects on patient-important outcomes, formal or informal modeling is needed to estimate effects. We describe the EtD criteria based on examples developed with GRADEpro (www.gradepro.org), GRADE's software that also allows development and dissemination of interactive summary of findings tables. CONCLUSION: EtD frameworks for developing recommendations and making decisions about tests lay out the sequential steps in reviewing and assessing the different types of evidence that need to be linked.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.032
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84991666275
dc.identifier.pmid26931285
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30852
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier USA
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
dc.sourceMedline
dc.subjectClinical competence/standards
dc.subjectEducation, medical/standards
dc.subjectEducational measurement/standards
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicine/standards
dc.subjectGuidelines as topic
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPublic health/education
dc.subjectDecision-making
dc.subjectGrade
dc.subjectGradepro
dc.subjectGuidelines
dc.subjectRecommendations
dc.subjectSummary of findings
dc.subjectTests
dc.titleGRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9324.pdf
Size:
446.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format