Relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta analysis

dc.contributor.authorMerashli, Mira
dc.contributor.authorDelgado-Alves, Jose
dc.contributor.authorGentile, Fabrizio
dc.contributor.authorAmes, Paul R.J.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentRheumatology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:50:30Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:50:30Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBackground The relationship between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and multiple sclerosis (MS) is unclear. Objectives To evaluate a link between aPL and MS. Methods EMBASE and PubMed search to August 2016; Peto's odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis. Results The pooled prevalence of participants positive for IgG and IgM anticardiolipin (aCL) from 12 case–control studies was superior in MS than controls (6.8% vs 1.8%, p = 0.01 and 8.58% vs 2.18%, p = 0.001) with medium and high heterogeneities respectively (I2 = 48.55% and 68.13%). The pooled prevalence of participants positive for IgG anti-beta2glycoprotein-I (aβ2GPI) from seven case–control studies was lower in MS than controls (0.93% vs 4.02%) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 53.92%) though the pooled prevalence of participants positive for IgM aβ2GPI was similar (7.24% vs 6.13%) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 52.85%). Five cohorts compared IgG/IgM aCL and IgM aβ2GPI in stable/remission vs active/relapsing MS: the pooled prevalence of IgG aCL was similar in active/relapsing and stable/remission MS (19% vs 18.9%) but the pooled prevalence of IgM aCL was higher in active than in stable MS (36.9% vs 21%, p < 0.0001) as well as that of IgM β2GPI (40.5% vs 3.2%, p < 0.0001) with no heterogeneity. Conclusion Data from case–control studies do not support a link between IgG/IgM aPL and MS. Data from cohort studies comparing active vs stable MS indicate a strong link between aPL of IgM isotype and active/relapsing MS but in the absence of aPL titres to comment upon this may either represent an epiphenomenon of active neuro-inflammation or natural autoantibodies devoid of pathogenic potential. Data expressed as frequency of aPL positive participants rather than average titres preclude further assumptions. © 2017
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.09.010
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85007359383
dc.identifier.pmid27908533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30951
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherW.B. Saunders
dc.relation.ispartofSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAntiphospholipid antibodies
dc.subjectMultiple sclerosis
dc.subjectAntibodies, antiphospholipid
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImmunoglobulin g
dc.subjectImmunoglobulin m
dc.subjectBeta2 glycoprotein 1 antibody
dc.subjectCardiolipin antibody
dc.subjectPhospholipid antibody
dc.subjectAge distribution
dc.subjectAntibody blood level
dc.subjectAntibody titer
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectCerebrospinal fluid level
dc.subjectDisease activity
dc.subjectDisease association
dc.subjectDisease classification
dc.subjectDisease control
dc.subjectDisease severity
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMeta analysis
dc.subjectNewcastle-ottawa scale
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectProtein function
dc.subjectSex difference
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectSystemic lupus erythematosus
dc.subjectBlood
dc.subjectImmunology
dc.titleRelevance of antiphospholipid antibodies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta analysis
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-8800.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format