Physicians’ approach to end of life care: comparison of two tertiary care university hospitals in Lebanon

dc.contributor.authorDabar, Georges
dc.contributor.authorBou-Akl, Imad J.
dc.contributor.authorSader, Mirella
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDivisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:02:25Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:02:25Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: The care of terminally ill patients is fraught with ethical and medical dilemmas carried by healthcare professionals. The present study aims to explore the approaches of Lebanese attending physicians towards palliative care, end of life (EOL) care, and patient management in two tertiary care university hospitals with distinct medical culture. Methods: Four hundred attending physicians from the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) and Hotel Dieu de France (HDF) were recruited. Participants were Medical Doctors in direct contact with adult patients that could be subject to EOL situations providing relevant demographic, educational, religious as well as personal, medical or patient-centric data. Results: The majority of physicians in both establishments were previously exposed to life-limiting decisions but remains uncomfortable with the decision to stop or limit resuscitation. However, physicians with an American training (AUBMC) were significantly more likely to exhibit readiness to initiate and discuss DNR with patients (p<0.0001). While the paternalistic medicinal approach was prevalent in both groups, physicians with a European training (HDF) more often excluded patient involvement based on family preference (p<0.0001) or to spare them from a traumatic situation (p=0.003). The majority of respondents reported that previous directives from the patient were fundamental to life-limiting decisions. However, the influence of patient and medical factors (e.g. culture, religion, life expectancy, age, socioeconomic status) was evidenced in the HDF group. Conclusion: Early physician-initiated EOL discussions remain challenged in Lebanon. Paternalistic attitudes limit shared decision making and are most evident in European-trained physicians. Establishing a sound and effective framework providing legal, ethical and religious guidance is thus needed in Lebanon. © 2021, The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03022-x
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85119841507
dc.identifier.pmid34823513
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31488
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Medical Education
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAttitude
dc.subjectEnd-of-life decisions
dc.subjectMedical culture
dc.subjectPhysicians
dc.subjectTerminal care
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAttitude of health personnel
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectHospitals, university
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectTertiary healthcare
dc.subjectHealth personnel attitude
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPhysician
dc.subjectTertiary health care
dc.subjectUniversity hospital
dc.titlePhysicians’ approach to end of life care: comparison of two tertiary care university hospitals in Lebanon
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021-2222.pdf
Size:
810.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format