The reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: A cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorKhamis, Assem M.
dc.contributor.authorBou-Karroum, Lama
dc.contributor.authorHakoum, Maram B.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Gibbawi, Mounir
dc.contributor.authorHabib, Joseph R.
dc.contributor.authorEl-Jardali, Fadi
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK)
dc.contributor.departmentFamily Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.facultyCenter for Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T14:01:50Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T14:01:50Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBackground: Major research-reporting statements, such as PRISMA and CONSORT, require authors to provide information about funding. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the reporting of funding in health policy and systems research (HPSR) papers and (2) to assess the funding reporting policies of journals publishing on HPSR. Methods: We conducted two cross-sectional surveys for papers published in 2016 addressing HPSR (both primary studies and systematic reviews) and for journals publishing on HPSR (both journals under the 'Health Policy and Services' (HPS) category in the Web of Science, and non-HPS journals that published on HPSR). Teams of two reviewers selected studies and abstracted data in duplicate and independently. We conducted descriptive analyses and a regression analysis to investigate the association between reporting of funding by papers and the journal's characteristics. Results: We included 400 studies (200 systematic reviews and 200 primary studies) that were published in 198 journals. Approximately one-third (31%) of HPSR papers did not report on funding. Of those that did, only 11% reported on the role of funders (15% of systematic reviews and 7% of primary studies). Of the 198 journals publishing on HPSR, 89% required reporting of the source of funding. Of those that did, about one-third (34%) required reporting of the role of funders. Journals classified under the HPS category (n=72) were less likely than non-HPS journals that published HPSR studies (n=142) to require information on the role of funders (15% vs. 32%). We did not find any of the journals' characteristics to be associated with the reporting of funding by papers. Conclusions: Despite the majority of journals publishing on HPSR requiring the reporting of funding, approximately one-third of HPSR papers did not report on the funding source. Moreover, few journals publishing on HPSR required the reporting of the role of funders, and few HPSR papers reported on that role. © 2018 The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0356-3
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85051934528
dc.identifier.pmid30119673
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/34705
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Research Policy and Systems
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFunding
dc.subjectHealth policy
dc.subjectHealth systems
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectCross-sectional studies
dc.subjectEditorial policies
dc.subjectFinancing, government
dc.subjectHealth services research
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPeriodicals as topic
dc.subjectPrivate sector
dc.subjectResearch report
dc.subjectResearch support as topic
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectCross-sectional study
dc.subjectHealth care policy
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPublishing
dc.subjectRegression analysis
dc.subjectWeb of science
dc.subjectFinancial management
dc.subjectPublication
dc.subjectResearch
dc.titleThe reporting of funding in health policy and systems research: A cross-sectional study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018-8077.pdf
Size:
720.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format