Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review

dc.contributor.authorLechien, Jérôme Rene
dc.contributor.authorAkst, Lee Michael
dc.contributor.authorHamdan, Abdul Latif H.
dc.contributor.authorSchindler, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorKarkos, Petros D.
dc.contributor.authorBarillari, Maria Rosaria
dc.contributor.authorCalvo-Henríquez, Christian E.
dc.contributor.authorCrevier-Buchman, Lise
dc.contributor.authorFinck, Camille L.
dc.contributor.authorEun, Young-gyu
dc.contributor.authorSaussez, Sven
dc.contributor.authorVaezi, Michael F.
dc.contributor.departmentOtolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:09:27Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:09:27Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractObjective: To review the current literature about the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Data Sources: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature on LPR epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment was conducted. Using the PRISMA statement, 3 authors selected relevant publications to provide a critical analysis of the literature. Conclusions: The important heterogeneity across studies in LPR diagnosis continues to make it difficult to summarize a single body of thought. Controversies persist concerning epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. No recent epidemiologic study exists regarding prevalence and incidence with the use of objective diagnostic tools. There is no survey that evaluates the prevalence of symptoms and signs on a large number of patients with confirmed LPR. Regarding diagnosis, an increasing number of authors used multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH monitoring, although there is no consensus regarding standardization of the diagnostic criteria. The efficiency of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy remains poorly demonstrated and misevaluated by incomplete clinical tools that do not take into consideration many symptoms and extralaryngeal findings. Despite the recent advances in knowledge about nonacid LPR, treatment protocols based on PPIs do not seem to have evolved. Implications for Practice: The development of multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH monitoring and pepsin and bile salt detection should be considered for the establishment of a multiparameter diagnostic approach. LPR treatment should evolve to a more personalized regimen, including diet, PPIs, alginate, and magaldrate according to individual patient characteristics. Multicenter international studies with a standardized protocol could improve scientific knowledge about LPR. © American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2019.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0194599819827488
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85061619007
dc.identifier.pmid30744489
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32055
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectGastroesophageal
dc.subjectLaryngitis
dc.subjectLaryngopharyngeal reflux
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectProton pump inhibitor
dc.subjectAlgorithm
dc.subjectDisease severity
dc.subjectDysphonia
dc.subjectEsophagitis
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMicrotrauma
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectScientific literature
dc.subjectSleep disordered breathing
dc.titleEvaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-7551.pdf
Size:
516.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format