Trust Repair Strategies along the Claim/Dispute Timeline

dc.contributor.advisorAbdul Malak, Mohamed-Asem
dc.contributor.authorAl Awar, Bahaa
dc.contributor.commembersMaddah, Bacel
dc.contributor.commembersKhoury, Hiam
dc.contributor.commembersBarakat, Mohammad
dc.contributor.degreeME
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date2023
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-10T11:36:27Z
dc.date.available2023-02-10T11:36:27Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-09T22:00:00Z
dc.date.submitted2023-02-05T22:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractClaims and disputes are inevitable in construction projects. Focusing on non-contractual mechanisms such as trust contributes to minimizing the occurrence of disputes. The existence of trust between project participants enhances the project performance and contributes to successfully delivering the project smoothly. However, several aspects may cause trust deterioration between the participants of the project. The main subjects that may lead to trust deterioration among the project participants are delays in work progress, delays in releasing payments, opportunistic behaviors, and rework due to change orders. The presence of claims causes trust to deteriorate between the parties. A demand is made by either party pursuant to the contract conditions, such an action by either party is taken to protect its entitlement under the contract. Either party may perform violated action(s) during the administration process of claims and disputes, causing trust to further deteriorate between the parties. Trust deterioration is felt at the individual level, and it is felt differently among the project participants. The conflict between the participants may reach a level where the project participants (employer, engineer, and contractor) commit back-and-forth violated actions during the administration process of claims and disputes, leading to a cycle of violated actions. In this regard, it is significant to implement trust repair strategies to repair the broken trust between the parties and to preserve trust through the project period. Researchers have discussed how trust is established, deteriorated, and repaired in construction projects, but no research has yet discussed both trust deterioration and trust-repair strategies in the context of the claim/dispute timeline. This research aims to classify and highlight the possible actions that contribute to trust deterioration in relation to the stages offered in the standard claim/dispute timelines, specifically FIDIC 2017, and to explore the interjection of trust-repair strategies along the claim/dispute timeline to repair trust between the participants of the project.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/23941
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectClaims and Disputes
dc.subjectTrust Deterioration
dc.subjectTrust Repair Strategies
dc.titleTrust Repair Strategies along the Claim/Dispute Timeline
dc.typeThesis
local.AUBID202022749

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AlAwarBahaa _2023.pdf
Size:
6.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.65 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: