The ecosystem of health decision making: from fragmentation to synergy

dc.contributor.authorSchunëmann, Holger J.
dc.contributor.authorReinap, Marge
dc.contributor.authorPiggott, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLaidmäe, Erki
dc.contributor.authorKöhler, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorPōld, Mariliis
dc.contributor.authorEns, Brendalynn
dc.contributor.authorIrs, Alar
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorCuello-García, Carlos Alberto
dc.contributor.authorFalavigna, Maicon
dc.contributor.authorGibbens, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorNeamţiu, Luciana
dc.contributor.authorParmelli, Elena
dc.contributor.authorJameleddine, Mouna
dc.contributor.authorPyke, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorVerstijnen, Ilse M.
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Coello, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorTugwell, Peter S.L.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yuan
dc.contributor.authorSaz-Parkinson, Z.
dc.contributor.authorKuchenmüller, Tanja
dc.contributor.authorMoja, Lorenzo P.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:44:38Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:44:38Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractClinicians, patients, policy makers, funders, programme managers, regulators, and science communities invest considerable amounts of time and energy in influencing or making decisions at various levels, using systematic reviews, health technology assessments, guideline recommendations, coverage decisions, selection of essential medicines and diagnostics, quality assurance and improvement schemes, and policy and evidence briefs. The criteria and methods that these actors use in their work differ (eg, the role economic analysis has in decision making), but these methods frequently overlap and exist together. Under the aegis of WHO, we have brought together representatives of different areas to reconcile how the evidence that influences decisions is used across multiple health system decision levels. We describe the overlap and differences in decision-making criteria between different actors in the health sector to provide bridging opportunities through a unifying broad framework that we call theory of everything. Although decision-making activities respond to system needs, processes are often poorly coordinated, both globally and on a country level. A decision made in isolation from other decisions on the same topic could cause misleading, unnecessary, or conflicted inputs to the health system and, therefore, confusion and resource waste. © 2022 World Health Organization
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00057-3
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85127501181
dc.identifier.pmid35366410
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30473
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofThe Lancet Public Health
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdministrative personnel
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectEcosystem
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectTechnology assessment, biomedical
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectBiomedical technology assessment
dc.subjectEcosystem health
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectManager
dc.subjectPractice guideline
dc.subjectQuality control
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.titleThe ecosystem of health decision making: from fragmentation to synergy
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022-5630.pdf
Size:
396.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format