Feasibility study for an independent power producer project in Jordan -

dc.contributor.authorHijazi, Rawan Amin
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Business
dc.contributor.facultySuliman S. Olayan School of Business
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date2014
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-03T10:43:30Z
dc.date.available2015-02-03T10:43:30Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.descriptionProject. M.B.A. American University of Beirut. Suliman S. Olayan School of Business, 2014. Pj:1823
dc.descriptionFirst Reader : Dr. Victor Araman, Associate Professor, Suliman S. Olayan School of Business ; Second Reader : Mr. Ziad Younes, General Manager of BUTEC S.A.L.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 63-65)
dc.description.abstractBUTEC s.a.l. is an engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor operating in the MENA and GCC regions. BUTEC is considering applying to the tender of a new potential project for developing a power production plant in Jordan. This is a turnkey project where the Jordanian government is providing general requirements for the design of the plant; while the contractor is appointed to be an independent power producer (IPP) responsible for designing, procuring, constructing and operating it. Fuel will be supplied by the government in turn for buying the electric energy produced at a cost per kWh. The design of the IPP project involves choosing one power production method among many alternatives; this depends on the technology proposed by the original equipment manufacturers (OEM’s), where eventually the most optimal one will be chosen. A feasibility study is conducted for the IPP project in order to determine the most feasible alternative, based upon which BUTEC will submit its tender documents. This is done by first developing twelve different alternatives for the power production method and calculating the levelized cost (LC) of each. The LC is an indicator used to compare the different alternatives; it is the minimum price of electric energy to be sold at which the project breaks even over its lifetime. It encompasses all costs needed to develop and operate the IPP project which include: capital expenditure, operation and maintenance cost, fuel cost as well as the cost of capital. The study concludes that the cheapest alternative is to use a reciprocating engine technology supplied from Z, operating as a combined cycle mechanism using natural gas. However, there are many factors, other than the cheapest cost, that should be considered when choosing the optimal alternative to bid upon. These include: the net present value of the project, the actual energy generated to be sold, in addition to the effect of the variability of some factors included in the LC calculations such as the fuel cost.
dc.format.extentx, 65 leaves : illustrations ; 30 cm
dc.identifier.otherb18290607
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/10201
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofTheses, Dissertations, and Projects
dc.subject.classificationPj:001823 AUBNO
dc.subject.lcshFeasibility studies -- Jordan.
dc.subject.lcshPower-plants -- Jordan.
dc.subject.lcshElectric power production -- Economic aspects -- Jordan.
dc.subject.lcshElectric power systems -- Economic aspects -- Jordan.
dc.subject.lcshEnergy development -- Jordan -- Cost effectiveness.
dc.subject.lcshCash flow -- Jordan.
dc.titleFeasibility study for an independent power producer project in Jordan -
dc.typeProject

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pj-1823.pdf
Size:
3.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format