Requirements of health policy and services journals for authors to disclose financial and non-financial conflicts of interest: A cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorKhamis, Assem M.
dc.contributor.authorHakoum, Maram B.
dc.contributor.authorBou-Karroum, Lama
dc.contributor.authorHabib, Joseph R.
dc.contributor.authorAli, Ahmed K.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Guyatt H.
dc.contributor.authorEl-Jardali, Fadi
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.facultyCenter for Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T14:01:49Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T14:01:49Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBackground: The requirements of the health policy and services journals for authors to report their financial and non-financial conflicts of interest (COI) are unclear. The present article aims to assess the requirements of health policy and services journals for authors to disclose their financial and non-financial COIs. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of journals listed by the Web of Science under the category of 'Health Policy and Services'. We reviewed the 'Instructions for Authors' on the journals' websites and then simulated the submission of a manuscript to obtain any additional relevant information made available during that step. We abstracted data in duplicate and independently using a standardised form. Results: Out of 72 eligible journals, 67 (93%) had a COI policy. A minority of policies described how the disclosed COIs of authors would impact the editorial process (34%). None of the policies had clear-cut criteria for rejection based on the content of the disclosure. Approximately a fifth of policies (21%) explicitly stated that inaccurate or incomplete disclosures might lead to manuscript rejection or retraction. No policy described whether the journal would verify the accuracy or completeness of authors' disclosed COIs. Most journals' policies (93%) required the disclosure of at least one form of financial COI. While the majority asked for specification of source of payment (71%), a minority asked for the amount (18%). Overall, 81% of policies explicitly required disclosure of non-financial COIs. Conclusion: A majority of health policy and services journal policies required the disclosure of authors' financial and non-financial COIs, but few required details on disclosed COIs. Health policy journals should provide specific definitions and instructions for disclosing non-financial COIs. A framework providing clear typology and operational definitions of the different types of COIs will facilitate both their disclosure by authors and reviewers and their assessment and management by the editorial team and the readers. © 2017 The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0244-2
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85029760390
dc.identifier.pmid28927424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/34702
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Research Policy and Systems
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectConflict of interest
dc.subjectCross-sectional studies
dc.subjectDisclosure
dc.subjectHealth policy
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPeriodicals as topic
dc.subjectCross-sectional study
dc.subjectHealth care policy
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPublication
dc.subjectSimulation
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectWeb of science
dc.subjectInterpersonal communication
dc.titleRequirements of health policy and services journals for authors to disclose financial and non-financial conflicts of interest: A cross-sectional study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-8764.pdf
Size:
588.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format