Towards bridging the water gap in Texas: A water-energy-food nexus approach
Loading...
Files
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Abstract
The 2017 Texas Water Development Board's State Water Plan predicts a 41% gap between water demand and existing supply by 2070. This reflects an overall projection, but the challenge will affect various regions of the state differently. Texas has 16 regional water planning zones characterized by distinct populations, water demands, and existing water supplies. Each is expected to face variations of pressures, such as increased agricultural and energy development (particularly hydraulic fracturing) and urban growth that do not necessarily follow the region's water plan. Great variability in resource distribution and competing resource demands across Texas will result in the emergence of distinct hotspots, each with unique characteristics that require multiple, localized, interventions to bridge the statewide water gap. This study explores three such hotspots: 1) water-food competition in Lubbock and the potential of producing 3 billion gallons of treated municipal waste water and encouraging dryland agriculture; 2) implementing Low Impact Developments (LIDs) for agriculture in the City of San Antonio, potentially adding 47 billion gallons of water supply, but carrying a potentially high financial cost; and 3) water-energy interrelations in the Eagle Ford Shale in light of well counts, climate dynamics, and population growth. The growing water gap is a state wide problem that requires holistic assessments that capture the impact on the tightly interconnected water, energy, and food systems. Better understanding the trade-offs associated with each 'solution’ and enabling informed dialogue between stakeholders, offers a basis for formulating localized policy recommendations specific to each hotspot. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
Description
Keywords
Assessment tools, Holistic assessment, Localized solutions, Trade-offs, Water-energy-food nexus, Cities, Conservation of natural resources, Food, Texas, Water, Water supply, San antonio, United states, Agriculture, Commerce, Economic and social effects, Population statistics, Urban growth, Wastewater treatment, Ground water, Surface water, Well water, Assessment tool, Trade off, Holistic approach, Policy approach, Resource assessment, Resource development, Trade-off, Water demand, Water planning, Aquifer, Article, Carbon footprint, Climate change, Energy cost, Energy resource, Environmental sustainability, Fracking, Population growth, Priority journal, Resource allocation, Spatiotemporal analysis, Waste water management, Waste water recycling, Waste water treatment plant, Water availability, Water conservation, Water quality, City, Environmental protection, Procedures, Statistics and numerical data, Water treatment