The feasibility of solar-powered small-scale brackish water desalination units in a coastal aquifer prone to saltwater intrusion: A comparison between electrodialysis reversal and reverse osmosis

dc.contributor.authorHamdan, Hanan
dc.contributor.authorSaidy, Maria
dc.contributor.authorAlameddine, Ibrahim M.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Hindi, Mahmoud
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:33:03Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:33:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIn the face of increasing water shortages worldwide, water desalination has the potential to expand the available freshwater supply options in many water stressed regions. This paper assesses the feasibility of adopting photovoltaic powered small-scale brackish water desalination units in a coastal aquifer facing saltwater intrusion and chronic water shortages. Moreover, a detailed cost comparison, which incorporates the associated environmental costs, is conducted between the Electrodialysis Reversal (EDR) technique and Reverse Osmosis (RO). The results showed that PV-powered small-scale desalination units were more economically viable as compared to grid-powered units, when the electricity tariffs reflected non-subsidized electricity prices and environmental costs were internalized. EDR-PV proved to be more economically feasible and with a lower environmental footprint as compared to RO-PV, up until the salinity of the aquifer was below 5000 ppm (EDR: 0.57–1.18 $/m3; RO = 1.19–1.59 $/m3). Beyond that salinity, the RO-PV was found to be the more economically viable option, with costs reaching as high as 2.65 $/m3 at a salinity of 25,000 ppm. Overall, the environmental costs between the two technologies varied significantly, largely due to differences in the generated brine volume, with EDR having better efficiencies at lower salinity levels. Finally, the study highlighted the risk of accelerating saltwater intrusion as a result of the increased market penetration of solar-powered desalination units along vulnerable coastal aquifers. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112604
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85105055894
dc.identifier.pmid33957411
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/27922
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAcademic Press
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Management
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBrackish water
dc.subjectCost analysis
dc.subjectElectrodialysis reversal
dc.subjectEnvironmental cost
dc.subjectPv-powered desalination
dc.subjectReverse osmosis
dc.subjectFeasibility studies
dc.subjectGroundwater
dc.subjectOsmosis
dc.subjectSaline waters
dc.subjectSalinity
dc.subjectSeawater
dc.subjectWater purification
dc.subjectDrinking water
dc.subjectFresh water
dc.subjectGround water
dc.subjectSalt water
dc.subjectSea water
dc.subjectAquifer
dc.subjectBrine
dc.subjectCoastal aquifer
dc.subjectDesalination
dc.subjectElectrokinesis
dc.subjectSaline intrusion
dc.subjectSolar power
dc.subjectAlternating current
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectCarbon footprint
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectCost benefit analysis
dc.subjectElectrodialysis
dc.subjectEnergy consumption
dc.subjectEnergy cost
dc.subjectEnergy yield
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact
dc.subjectFeasibility study
dc.subjectFluid intake
dc.subjectQuestionnaire
dc.subjectRenewable energy
dc.subjectSeashore
dc.subjectSolar energy
dc.subjectWater supply
dc.subjectWater management
dc.titleThe feasibility of solar-powered small-scale brackish water desalination units in a coastal aquifer prone to saltwater intrusion: A comparison between electrodialysis reversal and reverse osmosis
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021-5958.pdf
Size:
7.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format