FIGO position paper on reference charts for fetal growth and size at birth: Which one to use?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

John Wiley and Sons Ltd

Abstract

Publication of the Intergrowth-21st and WHO growth charts raises the question of which growth data prenatal providers should use in clinical practice. Is it better to use a universal chart applied globally, or metrics based on local or regional growth patterns? And what about customized charts versus local charts? FIGO has reviewed the different growth charts and studies assessing their reproducibility and predictive values for small- and large-for-gestational age newborns and, where available, adverse fetal outcomes. It concludes that local or regional charts are likely to be best for identifying the 10th percentile of newborns at highest risk. However, international standards for growth may also be used when coupled with locally appropriate thresholds for risk interpretation. © 2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Description

Keywords

Fetal growth charts, Intergrowth, Neonatal birthweight charts, Birth weight, Female, Fetal development, Gestational age, Growth charts, Humans, Infant, newborn, Infant, small for gestational age, Pregnancy, Reproducibility of results, Adverse outcome, Article, Fetus, Fetus growth, Fetus outcome, High risk population, Human, Large for gestational age, Newborn, Outcome assessment, Predictive value, Priority journal, Reproducibility, Small for date infant, Standard, Fetus development, Growth chart, Growth, development and aging, Physiology

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By