Compositional and sensory differences of products of sweet-cream and whey buttermilk produced by microfiltration, diafiltration, and supercritical CO21

dc.contributor.authorOlabi, Ammar A.
dc.contributor.authorJinjarak, S.
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Flores, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorWalker, John H.
dc.contributor.authorDaroub, Hamza
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences (FAFS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:18:53Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:18:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThe objectives of this work were to assess the compositional properties and sensory characteristics of ingredients produced by treating sweet-cream and whey-cream buttermilks with microfiltration (MF), diafiltration (DF), and supercritical CO2 (SFE) extraction. Sweet-cream buttermilk (CBM) and buttermilk resulting from churning the residual fat from whey processing (whey buttermilk, WBM) were used. Using MF or microfiltration followed by diafiltration (MF-DF), we obtained resulting retentates that were dried and then were subjected to SFE treatment. Control buttermilks, SFE resulting products, and MF and MF-DF SFE and all treated retentates products totaled 16 samples (2 types × 4 treatments × 2 batches). Eleven trained panelists assessed samples using descriptive analysis. Sweet-cream buttermilk was higher in protein and lactose, whereas the WBM had similar total protein, mainly β-LG and α-LA but very low lactose. The resulting samples in order of concentration for fat and lactose were control samples>SFE treated>MF treated>DF=MF-SFE and DF-SFE. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE protein profiling showed negligible casein for WBM versus CBM and less whey proteins for CBM versus WBM, as expected. Whey buttermilk was more yellow, salty, sour, and rancid than CBM. Regarding the treatments, significant differences were obtained on homogeneity, opacity, rancid odor, cardboard and sour flavors, sweet and salty tastes, viscosity, and mouthcoating, where SFE-treated samples showed lowest rancid odor and cardboard flavor. © 2015 American Dairy Science Association.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9141
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84929513892
dc.identifier.pmid25864057
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/24728
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dairy Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectButtermilk
dc.subjectSensory evaluation
dc.subjectSupercritical fluid extraction
dc.subjectWhey
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectCarbon dioxide
dc.subjectCaseins
dc.subjectCultured milk products
dc.subjectElectrophoresis, polyacrylamide gel
dc.subjectFiltration
dc.subjectFood handling
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLactose
dc.subjectOdors
dc.subjectTaste
dc.subjectViscosity
dc.subjectWhey proteins
dc.subjectCasein
dc.subjectWhey protein
dc.subjectAnalysis
dc.subjectAnimal
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subjectDairy product
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectOdor
dc.subjectPolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.subjectFood science
dc.titleCompositional and sensory differences of products of sweet-cream and whey buttermilk produced by microfiltration, diafiltration, and supercritical CO21
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015-10018.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format