Performance assessment of community-based interventions for water and sanitation improvement in urban slums

dc.contributor.authorAlameddine, Mirna Mohammad Saoud
dc.contributor.departmentInterfaculty Graduate Environmental Sciences Program (Environmental Technology)en_US
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Architectureen_US
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-02T09:21:44Z
dc.date.available2013-10-02T09:21:44Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.E.S.)--American University of Beirut, Interfaculty Graduate Environmental Sciences Program (Environmental Technology), 2012.en_US
dc.descriptionAdvisor : Dr. Mutassem El-Fadel, Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering--Committee Members : Ms. Rania Maroun, Research Associate, Civil and Environmental Engineering ; Dr. May Massoud, Associate Professor, Environmental Health ; Dr. Ibrahim Jamali, Assistant Professor, Suliman S. Olayan School of Business.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 114-122)en_US
dc.description.abstractUrban slums are underprivileged heavily populated areas that endure improper access to safe water for drinking and domestic usage, which often entails health concerns, namely diarrhea. Water, sanitation and hygiene improvement interventions have been reported to contribute to averting around 94 percent of water-related diarrhea cases. Tebbaneh in North Lebanon is one of the poorest urban slums in the Middle East region. Its dwellers suffer from degraded water supply and sanitation services that contribute to a high incidence rate of diarrhea (33 percent in 2009). An IDRC funded project studied the situation in Tebbaneh and assessed the local environmental services, and consequently helped develop five alternatives for water improvement at the household-building level: (1) installing rooftop plastic tanks, (2) renewing the water piping system inside the building, (3) renewing the wastewater plumbing system, (4) alternatives 1 and 2, and (5) alternatives 1, 2, and 3. A Social Cost Benefit Analysis was conducted to assess the economic feasibility of the five alternatives. It revealed that installing rooftop tanks, or a new water piping system or both are the most beneficial interventions and can achieve a positive return on investment within a range of 2 to 25 years depending on the Costs and Benefits scenario Performance assessment of implemented interventions showed an improvement in water quality, whereby 53percent and 92percent of the sampling episodes showed lower Total and Fecal Coliform concentrations respectively. Also, the interventions achieved a statistically significant decrease in diarrhea episodes (p-value = 0.030) and the improvement it induced was positively perceived by 57percent of respondents. Finally, an attempt was made to manage the complexity of intertwined pollution sources through a comprehensive sustainable development framework that outlined actions at the national, slum, and household levels to improve water and sanitation services in the Tebbaneh slum. A matrix of responsibilities along with constraints and finanen_US
dc.format.extentvii, 122 leaves : ill. (some col.) ; 30 cm.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/9468
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTheses, Dissertations, and Projects
dc.subject.classificationET:005742 AUBNOen_US
dc.subject.lcshSlums -- Lebanon -- Tripoli.en_US
dc.subject.lcshWater-supply -- Lebanon -- Tripoli -- Management.en_US
dc.subject.lcshWater quality management -- Lebanon -- Tripoli -- Cost effectiveness.en_US
dc.subject.lcshSanitation -- Lebanon -- Tripoli -- Evaluation.en_US
dc.subject.lcshUrban health -- Lebanon -- Tripoli.en_US
dc.subject.lcshSustainable den_US
dc.subject.lcshTripoli (Lebanon) -- Social conditions.en_US
dc.titlePerformance assessment of community-based interventions for water and sanitation improvement in urban slumsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files