A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users’ guide to its application in the context of GRADE

dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Rebecca L.
dc.contributor.authorThayer, Kristina A.
dc.contributor.authorSantesso, Nancy A.
dc.contributor.authorHolloway, Alison C.
dc.contributor.authorBlain, Robyn B.
dc.contributor.authorEftim, Sorina E.
dc.contributor.authorGoldstone, Alexandra E.
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Pam K.
dc.contributor.authorAnsari, Mohammed Toseef
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorFilippini, Tommaso
dc.contributor.authorHansell, Anna Louise
dc.contributor.authorMeerpohl, Joerg J.
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Reem A.
dc.contributor.authorVerbeek, Jos H.A.M.
dc.contributor.authorVinceti, Marco
dc.contributor.authorWhaley, Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorSchunëmann, Holger J.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:55:36Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:55:36Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this paper is to explain how to apply, interpret, and present the results of a new instrument to assess the risk of bias (RoB) in non-randomized studies (NRS) dealing with effects of environmental exposures on health outcomes. This instrument is modeled on the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) instrument. The RoB instrument for NRS of exposures assesses RoB along a standardized comparison to a randomized target experiment, instead of the study-design directed RoB approach. We provide specific guidance for the integral steps of developing a research question and target experiment, distinguishing issues of indirectness from RoB, making individual-study judgments, and performing and interpreting sensitivity analyses for RoB judgments across a body of evidence. Also, we present an approach for integrating the RoB assessments within the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess the certainty of the evidence in the systematic review. Finally, we guide the reader through an overall assessment to support the rating of all domains that determine the certainty of a body of evidence using the GRADE approach. © 2018
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.004
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85056846087
dc.identifier.pmid30473382
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31211
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironment International
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEnvironmental health
dc.subjectGrade
dc.subjectNon-randomized studies
dc.subjectRisk of bias
dc.subjectRobins
dc.subjectStudy limitations
dc.subjectBias
dc.subjectEnvironmental exposure
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectRandom allocation
dc.subjectResearch design
dc.subjectRisk assessment
dc.subjectGrading
dc.subjectHealth risks
dc.subjectSensitivity analysis
dc.subjectIts applications
dc.subjectResearch questions
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectExperimental study
dc.subjectHealth impact
dc.subjectResearch
dc.subjectRisk factor
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman experiment
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.subjectAnalysis
dc.subjectMethodology
dc.subjectRandomization
dc.subjectStandards
dc.subjectStatistical bias
dc.titleA risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users’ guide to its application in the context of GRADE
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-7829.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format