Partial nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Where do we stand?

dc.contributor.authorShahait, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorMukherji, Deborah M.
dc.contributor.authorEl-Hout, Yaser
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Urology
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Hematology Oncology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:12:40Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:12:40Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractNephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) offers comparable oncologic results, but a lower risk of chronic kidney disease, when compared with radical nephrectomy. However, there are limited data in the literature examining the safety of NSS in the setting of metastatic RCC. To evaluate the feasibility of NSS and impact on cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with metastatic disease, we performed a systematic review of the literature. There is ample evidence that NSS is feasible in metastatic RCC, with comparable results in terms of CSS compared with radical cytoreductive nephrectomy.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.154300
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84926652427
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32830
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
dc.relation.ispartofIndian Journal of Urology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectMetastatic
dc.subjectPartial nephrectomy
dc.subjectRenal cell carcinoma
dc.subjectCancer specific survival
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectIntermethod comparison
dc.subjectKidney metastasis
dc.subjectNephrectomy
dc.subjectNephron sparing surgery
dc.subjectRadical cytoreductive nephrectomy
dc.subjectReview
dc.titlePartial nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Where do we stand?
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015-5062.pdf
Size:
343.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format