Prescription patterns for tigecycline in severely ill patients for non-FDA approved indications in a developing country: A compromised outcome
Loading...
Files
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Frontiers Research Foundation
Abstract
Introduction: With the rise in antibiotic resistance, tigecycline has been used frequently in off-label indications, based on its in-vitro activity against multidrug-resistant organisms. In this study, our aim was to assess its use in approved and unapproved indications. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective chart review evaluating a 2-year experience of tigecycline use for > 72 h in 153 adult patients inside and outside critical care unit from January 2012 to December 2013 in a Lebanese tertiary-care hospital. Results: Tigecycline was mostly used in off-label indications (81%) and prescribed inside the critical care area, where the number of tigecycline cycles was 16/1,000 patient days. Clinical success was achieved in 43.4% of the patients. In the critically ill group, it was significantly higher in patients with a SOFA score < 7 using multivariate analysis (Odds Ratio (OR) = 12.51 [4.29-36.51], P < 0.0001). Microbiological success was achieved in 43.3% of patients. Yet, the univariate and adjusted multivariate models failed to show a significant difference in this outcome between patients inside vs. outside critical care area, those with SOFA score < 7 vs. ≥ 7, and in FDA-approved vs. off-label indications. Total mortality reached ~45%. It was significantly higher in critically ill patients with SOFA score ≥7 (OR = 5.17 [2.43-11.01], P < 0.0001) and in off-label indications (OR = 4.00 [1.30-12.31], P = 0.01) using an adjusted multivariate model. Gram-negative bacteria represented the majority of the clinical isolates (81%) and Acinetobacter baumannii predominated (28%). Carbapenem resistance was present in 85% of the recovered Acinetobacter, yet, more than two third of the carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species were still susceptible to tigecycline. Conclusion: In our series, tigecycline has been mostly used in off-label indications, specifically in severely ill patients. The outcome of such infections was not inferior to that of FDA-approved indications, especially inside critical care area. The use of this last resort antibiotic in complicated clinical scenarios with baseline microbiological epidemiology predominated by extensively-drug resistant pathogens ought to be organized. © 2017 Moghnieh, Abdallah, Fawaz, Hamandi, Kassem, El-Rajab, Jisr, Mugharbil, Droubi, Al Tabah, Sinno, Ziade, Daoud and Ibrahim.
Description
Keywords
Acinetobacter baumannii, Antibiotic resistance, Antibiotic stewardship, Critically ill, Off-label indications, Tigecycline, Aminoglycoside, Carbapenem, Colistin, Hypertensive agent, Piperacillin plus tazobactam, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin, Acinetobacter, Adult, Aged, Antibiotic sensitivity, Article, Artificial ventilation, Cardiovascular disease, Clinical outcome, Controlled study, Critically ill patient, Developing country, Diseases, Drug approval, Drug indication, Female, Food and drug administration, Gram negative bacterium, Hospital mortality, Human, Kidney injury, Major clinical study, Male, Microbiology, Off label drug use, Retrospective study, Sequential organ failure assessment score, Treatment duration