Effect of heliox- and air-driven nebulized bronchodilator therapy on lung function in patients with asthma
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer New York LLC
Abstract
Background: This study compares the effect of heliox-driven to that of air-driven bronchodilator therapy on the pulmonary function test (PFT) in patients with different levels of asthma severity. Methods: One-hundred thirty-two participants were included in the study. Participants underwent spirometry twice with bronchodilator testing on two consecutive days. Air-driven nebulization was used one day and heliox-driven nebulization the other day in random order crossover design. After a baseline PFT, each participant received 2.5 mg of albuterol sulfate nebulized with the randomized driving gas. Post bronchodilator PFT was repeated after 30 min. The next day, the exact same protocol was repeated, except that the other driving gas was used to nebulize the drug. Participants were subgrouped and analyzed according to their baseline FEV1 on day 1: Group I, FEV1 ≥80 %; Group II, 80 % > FEV1 > 50 %; Group III, FEV1 ≤50 %. The proportion of participants with greater than 12 % and 200-mL increases from their baseline FEV1 and the changes from baseline in PFT variables were compared between heliox-driven versus air-driven bronchodilation therapy. Results: The proportion of participants with >12 % and 200-mL increases from their baseline FEV1 with air- or heliox-driven bronchodilation was not different with respect to the proportion of participants with baseline FEV 1 ≥80 % (20 vs. 18 %, respectively) and 80 % > FEV1 > 50 % (36 vs. 43 %, respectively), but it was significantly greater with heliox-driven bronchodilation in participants with FEV1 ≤50 % (43 vs. 73 %, respectively; p = 0.01). Changes from baseline FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75 %, FEFmax, FEF 25 %, FEF50 %, and FEF75 % were significantly larger with heliox-driven versus air-driven bronchodilation in participants with baseline FEV1 ≤50 %. Conclusion: Improvements in PFT variables are more frequent and profound with heliox-driven compared to air-driven bronchodilator therapy only in asthmatic patients with baseline FEV1 ≤50 %. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media.
Description
Keywords
Air, Asthma, Bronchodilator, Heliox, Nebulization, Pulmonary function test, Administration, inhalation, Adrenergic beta-2 receptor agonists, Adult, Aerosol propellants, Aged, Albuterol, Bronchodilator agents, Compressed air, Cross-over studies, Equipment design, Female, Forced expiratory volume, Helium, Humans, Lebanon, Lung, Male, Maximal midexpiratory flow rate, Middle aged, Nebulizers and vaporizers, Oxygen, Severity of illness index, Spirometry, Treatment outcome, Vital capacity, Beta 2 adrenergic receptor stimulating agent, Salbutamol sulfate, Bronchodilating agent, Propellant, Salbutamol, Airway obstruction, Article, Bronchodilatation, Controlled study, Crossover procedure, Disease severity, Gas, Human, Inhalational drug administration, Lung function, Lung function test, Major clinical study, Priority journal, Randomized controlled trial, Comparative study, Drug effects, Maximal mid expiratory flow, Nebulizer, Pathophysiology