Validity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale for use in sub-Saharan Africa and characteristics of food-insecure individuals

dc.contributor.authorWambogo, Edwina A.
dc.contributor.authorGhattas, Hala
dc.contributor.authorLeonard, Kenneth L.
dc.contributor.authorSahyoun, Nadine R.
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Research on Population and Health (CRPH)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:17:09Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:17:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) is a UN FAO-Voices of the Hungry project (FAO-VoH) metric of food insecurity (FI). The FAO-VoH tested the psychometric properties of FIES with the use of global 2014 Gallup World Poll (GWP) data. However, similarities in its psychometric structure in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to allow aggregation of SSA results were untested. Objectives: We aimed to 1) assess the validity of FIES for use in SSA, 2) determine the prevalence of FI by country, age group, and gender, and 3) examine the sociodemographic and economic characteristics of individuals with FI. Methods: The Rasch modeling procedure was applied to data collected by GWP in 2014 and 2015 on 57,792 respondents aged =19 y in SSA. Results: FIES largely met the Rasch model assumptions of equal discrimination and conditional independence. However, 34.3% of countries had high outfits (≥2.0) for the item went without eating for a whole day. Four countries had significant correlations for the items were hungry but did not eat and ran out of food. The overall prevalence of severe FI (SFI) was 36.4%, ranging from 6.0% in Mauritius to 87.3% in South Sudan. Older adults were at significantly higher risk of SFI than younger adults (38.6% and 35.8%, respectively, P < 0.0001), and women more than men (37.3% and 35.4%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Higher proportions of individuals with SFI were rural residents, less educated, lower income, unemployed, and lived in households with many children under the age of 15 y. Conclusions: FIES has acceptable levels of internal validity for use in SSA. However, the item went without eating for a whole day may need cognitive testing in a few SSA countries. For countries with correlated items, 1 of the items may be excluded. © The Author(s) 2018.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzy062
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85063310647
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/33674
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Developments in Nutrition
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFood insecurity
dc.subjectOlder adults
dc.subjectRasch modeling
dc.subjectSub-saharan africa
dc.subjectYounger adults
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectEating
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectHousehold
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman experiment
dc.subjectInternal validity
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMauritius
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectRasch analysis
dc.subjectRural population
dc.subjectSensitivity analysis
dc.subjectSouth sudan
dc.subjectUnemployment
dc.titleValidity of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale for use in sub-Saharan Africa and characteristics of food-insecure individuals
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018-8032.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format