Carbonyl Emissions and Heating Temperatures across 75 Nominally Identical Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Products: Do Manufacturing Variations Drive Pulmonary Toxicant Exposure?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Chemical Society

Abstract

Studies of factors that impact electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs) carbonyl compound (CC) emissions have been hampered by wide within-condition variability. In this study, we examined whether this variability may be related to heating coil temperature variations stemming from manufacturing differences. We determined the mean peak temperature rise (ΔTmax) and CC emissions from 75 Subox ENDSs powered at 30 W. We found that ΔTmax and CC emissions varied widely, with greater ΔTmax resulting in exponentially higher CC emissions. Also, 12% of atomizers accounted for 85% of total formaldehyde emissions. These findings suggest that major reductions in toxicant exposure might be achieved through regulations focusing on limiting coil temperature. © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Description

Keywords

Electronic nicotine delivery systems, Hazardous substances, Heating, Nebulizers and vaporizers, Nicotine, Temperature, Tobacco products, Carbonyl derivative, Formaldehyde, Article, Heating coil temperature, High temperature, Limit of detection, Limit of quantitation, Particulate matter, Reduction (chemistry), Dangerous goods, Electronic cigarette, Nebulizer, Tobacco

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By