Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Confirmation of Central Venous Catheter Placement: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Systematic

dc.contributor.authorBou Chebl, Ralph
dc.contributor.authorKiblawi, Shafeek
dc.contributor.authorEl Khuri, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorEl Hajj, Nadine
dc.contributor.authorBachir, Rana H.
dc.contributor.authorAoun, Roni
dc.contributor.authorAbou Dagher, Gilbert
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:41:28Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:41:28Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) for confirming the tip location and placement of central venous catheters in adult patients. Methods: A systematic review was performed using electronic databases, including MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria were studies conducted on adult patients receiving an internal jugular or a subclavian central venous catheter in the emergency department or intensive care unit. Furthermore, the catheter tip location had to be checked with the use of the agitated saline contrast-enhanced US technique. Results: A total of 2245 articles were screened by title and abstract. Seventeen articles were retrieved and assessed for the predefined inclusion criteria. Four articles and 1 abstract were used in the final analysis. Contrast-enhanced US showed pooled sensitivity of 72% (95% confidence interval, 44%-91%), pooled specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 99%-100%), a positive predictive value of 92.1%, and a negative predictive value of 98.5% compared with chest radiography for confirming the placement of central venous catheters. Conclusions: In the setting of central venous catheter placement, postprocedural contrast-enhanced US imaging is a safe, efficient, and highly specific confirmatory test for the catheter tip location compared with chest radiography. © 2017 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14296
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85040818780
dc.identifier.pmid28660688
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/29752
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCatheter
dc.subjectCritical care
dc.subjectEmergency medicine
dc.subjectPosition
dc.subjectRadiography
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.subjectCatheterization, central venous
dc.subjectCentral venous catheters
dc.subjectContrast media
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImage enhancement
dc.subjectJugular veins
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectSubclavian vein
dc.subjectUltrasonography, interventional
dc.subjectIntensive care units
dc.subjectLocation
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectUltrasonic applications
dc.subjectUltrasonics
dc.subjectContrast medium
dc.subjectContrast enhanced ultrasound
dc.subjectElectronic database
dc.subjectEmergency departments
dc.subjectNegative predictive value
dc.subjectPositive predictive values
dc.subjectCentral venous catheter
dc.subjectCentral venous catheterization
dc.subjectDevices
dc.subjectDiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectInterventional ultrasonography
dc.subjectJugular vein
dc.subjectMeta analysis
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.subjectCatheters
dc.titleUse of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Confirmation of Central Venous Catheter Placement: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Systematic
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-8531.pdf
Size:
695.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format