Clinical outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorLechien, Jérôme Rene
dc.contributor.authorSaussez, Sven
dc.contributor.authorSchindler, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorKarkos, Petros D.
dc.contributor.authorHamdan, Abdul Latif H.
dc.contributor.authorHarmegnies, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorde Marrez, Lisa G.
dc.contributor.authorFinck, Camille L.
dc.contributor.authorFabrice, Journe
dc.contributor.authorPaesmans, Marianne Msc
dc.contributor.authorVaezi, Michael F.
dc.contributor.departmentOtolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:09:27Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:09:27Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the therapeutic benefit of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) over placebo in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and to analyze the epidemiological factors of heterogeneity in the literature. Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted to identify articles published between 1990 and 2018 about clinical trials describing the efficiency of medical treatment(s) on LPR. First, a meta-analysis of placebo randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PPIs versus placebo was conducted according to diet. The heterogeneity, response to PPIs, and evolution of clinical scores were analyzed for aggregate results. Second, a systematic review of diagnosis methods, clinical outcome of treatment, and therapeutic regimens was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Results: The search identified 1,140 relevant publications, of which 72 studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 5,781 patients. Ten RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The combined relative risk was 1.31 in favor of PPIs and increased to 1.42 when patients did not receive diet recommendations. Randomized controlled trials were characterized by a significant heterogeneity due to discrepancies in clinical therapeutic outcomes, diagnosis methods (lack of gold standard diagnostic tools), and therapeutic scheme. The epidemiological analysis of all articles supports the existence of these discrepancies in the entire literature. In particular, many symptoms and signs commonly encountered in LPR are not assessed in the treatment effectiveness. The lack of diagnosis precision and variability of inclusion criteria particularly create bias in all reported and included articles. Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports a mild superiority of PPIs over placebo and the importance of diet as additional treatment but demonstrates the heterogeneity between studies, limiting the elaboration of clear conclusions. International recommendations are proposed for the development of future trials. Laryngoscope, 129:1174–1187, 2019. © 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27591
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85059451640
dc.identifier.pmid30597577
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32056
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofLaryngoscope
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectLaryngitis
dc.subjectLaryngopharyngeal
dc.subjectOutcome
dc.subjectReflux
dc.subjectSymptoms
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLaryngopharyngeal reflux
dc.subjectProton pump inhibitors
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trials as topic
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectProton pump inhibitor
dc.subjectClinical effectiveness
dc.subjectClinical outcome
dc.subjectEpidemiological data
dc.subjectGold standard
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMeta analysis
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectRisk factor
dc.subjectSymptomatology
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectTreatment response
dc.titleClinical outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-7547.pdf
Size:
1.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format