Experience and challenges for biologic use in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Africa and the Middle East region

dc.contributor.authorAl-Hammadi, Anwar
dc.contributor.authorAl-Sheikh, Afaf A.
dc.contributor.authorAmmoury, Alfred F.
dc.contributor.authorGhosn, Samer H.
dc.contributor.authorGisondi, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorHamadah, Issam Ribhi Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorKibbi, Abdul Ghani M.
dc.contributor.authorShirazy, Khalid
dc.contributor.departmentDermatology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:40:44Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:40:44Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThe incidence of psoriasis in Africa and the Middle East (AfME) is high as in other regions and represents a significant problem for both dermatologists and patients. Psoriasis co-morbidities such as obesity, cardiovascular disease and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are also particularly common in these regions and may be under-recognized and under-treated. Despite this, regional guidelines to aid physicians on the appropriate use of biologic agents in their clinical practice are limited. A group of expert dermatologists from across the AfME region were surveyed to help establish best practice across the region, alongside supporting data from the literature. Although biologics have significantly improved patient outcomes since their introduction, the results of this survey identified several unmet needs, including the lack of consensus regarding their use in clinical practice. Discrepancy also exists among AfME physicians concerning the clinical relevance of immunogenicity to biologics, despite increasing data across inflammatory diseases. Significant treatment and management of challenges for psoriasis patients remain, and a move towards individualized, tailored care may help to address these issues. The development of specific local guidelines for the treatment of both psoriasis and PsA could also be a step towards understanding the distinct patient profiles in these regions. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2016.1183763
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84969645884
dc.identifier.pmid27196814
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/29549
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dermatological Treatment
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiologics
dc.subjectCo-morbidities
dc.subjectGuidelines
dc.subjectScreening
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.subjectAfrica
dc.subjectArthritis, psoriatic
dc.subjectAttitude of health personnel
dc.subjectBiological products
dc.subjectClinical decision-making
dc.subjectCost-benefit analysis
dc.subjectDermatologic agents
dc.subjectDisease management
dc.subjectHealth care surveys
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMiddle east
dc.subjectPractice patterns, physicians'
dc.subjectPsoriasis
dc.subjectBiological product
dc.subjectDermatological agent
dc.subjectBiological therapy
dc.subjectClinical decision making
dc.subjectClinical practice
dc.subjectComorbidity assessment
dc.subjectCost effectiveness analysis
dc.subjectDermatologist
dc.subjectHealth education
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectLong term care
dc.subjectPatient referral
dc.subjectPatient safety
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectCost benefit analysis
dc.subjectHealth care survey
dc.subjectHealth personnel attitude
dc.subjectStatistics and numerical data
dc.titleExperience and challenges for biologic use in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Africa and the Middle East region
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2017-4502.pdf
Size:
913.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections