Treatment Strategies for Residual Disease following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

dc.contributor.authorAbdel-Razeq, Hikmat N.
dc.contributor.authorKhalil, Hanan
dc.contributor.authorAssi, Hazem I.
dc.contributor.authorDargham, Tarek Bou
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:43:36Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:43:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBreast cancer continues to be the most diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for breast cancer patients with locally advanced disease and patients with poor pathological features, such as triple-negative (TN) or human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive subtypes. Neoadjuvant therapy offers several advantages, including better surgical outcomes, early systemic treatment for micro-metastases, and accurate tumor biology and chemosensitivity assessment. Multiple studies have shown that achieving pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better prognosis and better treatment outcomes; almost half of such patients may fail to achieve pCR. Tumor proliferative index, hormone receptor (HR) status, and HER2 expression are the major predictors of pCR. Strategies to improve pCR have been dependent on augmenting neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the addition of taxanes and dual anti-HER2 targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive tumor, and more recently, immunotherapy for patients with TN disease. The clinical management of patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy varies and depends mostly on the level of HR expression and HER2 status. Recent data have suggested that switching trastuzumab to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive disease and the addition of capecitabine for patients with HER2-negative and HR-negative subtype is associated with a better outcome; both strategies are incorporated into current clinical practice guidelines. This paper reviews available and ongoing studies addressing strategies to better manage patients who continue to have residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. © 2022 by the authors.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29080458
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85136460894
dc.identifier.pmid36005196
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30318
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Oncology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectHer2-negative
dc.subjectHer2-positive
dc.subjectPathologic complete response
dc.subjectPost-neoadjuvant treatment
dc.subjectResidual disease
dc.subjectAdo-trastuzumab emtansine
dc.subjectBreast neoplasms
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant therapy
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectTrastuzumab
dc.subjectAnthracycline
dc.subjectAtezolizumab
dc.subjectBevacizumab
dc.subjectBrentuximab vedotin
dc.subjectCapecitabine
dc.subjectCarboplatin
dc.subjectCyclophosphamide
dc.subjectDoxorubicin
dc.subjectEpidermal growth factor receptor
dc.subjectEpidermal growth factor receptor 2
dc.subjectEverolimus
dc.subjectGemcitabine
dc.subjectGranulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor
dc.subjectHormone receptor
dc.subjectIniparib
dc.subjectKi 67 antigen
dc.subjectLapatinib
dc.subjectNelipepimut s
dc.subjectNeratinib
dc.subjectNicotinamide adenine dinucleotide adenosine diphosphate ribosyltransferase inhibitor
dc.subjectOlaparib
dc.subjectPaclitaxel
dc.subjectPembrolizumab
dc.subjectPertuzumab
dc.subjectTrastuzumab emtansine
dc.subjectTyrosine kinase receptor
dc.subjectApoptosis
dc.subjectCancer adjuvant therapy
dc.subjectCancer chemotherapy
dc.subjectCancer patient
dc.subjectCancer prognosis
dc.subjectCancer radiotherapy
dc.subjectCancer staging
dc.subjectCell proliferation
dc.subjectChemoradiotherapy
dc.subjectChemosensitivity
dc.subjectDiagnostic test accuracy study
dc.subjectDisease free survival
dc.subjectEndometrium carcinoma
dc.subjectGene expression
dc.subjectGlioblastoma
dc.subjectHealth care quality
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer
dc.subjectHypertension
dc.subjectImmune response
dc.subjectImmunotherapy
dc.subjectIn situ hybridization
dc.subjectMastectomy
dc.subjectMicrometastasis
dc.subjectMinimal residual disease
dc.subjectMolecularly targeted therapy
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant chemotherapy
dc.subjectOverall survival
dc.subjectPhase 2 clinical trial (topic)
dc.subjectPhase 3 clinical trial (topic)
dc.subjectPhenotype
dc.subjectPredictive value
dc.subjectProliferation index
dc.subjectProtein expression
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectSystemic therapy
dc.subjectThrombocytopenia
dc.subjectTreatment failure
dc.subjectTriple negative breast cancer
dc.subjectTumor resistance
dc.subjectTumor suppressor gene
dc.subjectBreast tumor
dc.subjectPathology
dc.titleTreatment Strategies for Residual Disease following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022-1575.pdf
Size:
472.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format