Current Evidence on Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Anticraving Intervention

dc.contributor.authorAlayan, Nour
dc.contributor.authorEller, Lucille Sanzero
dc.contributor.authorBates, Marsha E.
dc.contributor.authorCarmody, Dennis P.
dc.contributor.departmentHSON
dc.contributor.facultyRafic Hariri School of Nursing (HSON)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:21:54Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:21:54Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBackground: The limited success of conventional anticraving interventions encourages research into new treatment strategies. Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB), which is based on slowed breathing, was shown to improve symptom severity in various disorders. HRVB, and certain rates of controlled breathing (CB), may offer therapeutic potential as a complementary drug-free treatment option to help control substance craving. Methods: This review evaluated current evidence on the effectiveness of HRVB and CB training as a complementary anticraving intervention, based on guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Studies that assessed a cardiorespiratory feedback or CB intervention with substance craving as an outcome were selected. Effect sizes were calculated for each study. The Scale for Assessing Scientific Quality of Investigations in Complementary and Alternative Medicine was used to evaluate the quality of each study reviewed. Results: A total of eight articles remained for final review, including controlled studies with or without randomization, as well as noncontrolled trials. Most studies showed positive results with a variety of methodological quality levels and effect size. Current HRVB studies rated moderately on methodological rigor and showed inconsistent magnitudes of calculated effect size (0.074-0.727) across populations. The largest effect size was found in a nonclinical college population of high food cravers utilizing the most intensive HRVB training time of 240 min. Conclusions: Despite the limitations of this review, there is beginning evidence that HRVB and CB training can be of significant therapeutic potential. Larger clinical trials are needed with methodological improvements such as longer treatment duration, adequate control conditions, measures of adherence and compliance, longitudinal examination of craving changes, and more comprehensive methods of craving measurement. © Copyright 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2018.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2018.0019
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85056573899
dc.identifier.pmid29782180
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/34564
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnticraving intervention
dc.subjectComplementary
dc.subjectCraving
dc.subjectHeart rate variability biofeedback
dc.subjectSubstance use disorder
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectBiofeedback, psychology
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHeart rate
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectSubstance-related disorders
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectAcupuncture
dc.subjectAlternative medicine
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBiofeedback
dc.subjectBreathing exercise
dc.subjectClinical trial
dc.subjectCocaine dependence
dc.subjectDrug craving
dc.subjectDrug dependence
dc.subjectHeart rate variability
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectNeurofeedback
dc.subjectOpiate addiction
dc.subjectPriority journal
dc.subjectRespiratory sinus arrhythmia
dc.subjectTobacco dependence
dc.subjectTreatment duration
dc.subjectPhysiology
dc.titleCurrent Evidence on Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Anticraving Intervention
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018-7911.pdf
Size:
295.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format