Is Clinical Research Serving the Needs of the Global Cancer Burden? An Analysis of Contemporary Global Radiation Therapy Randomized Controlled Trials

dc.contributor.authorDodkins, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorHopman, Wilma M.
dc.contributor.authorWells, John Connor
dc.contributor.authorLievens, Yolande N.
dc.contributor.authorRozita, Abdul Malik
dc.contributor.authorPramesh, Conjeevaram S.
dc.contributor.authorGyawali, Bishal
dc.contributor.authorHammad, Nazik
dc.contributor.authorMukherji, Deborah M.
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Richard
dc.contributor.authorParkes, Jeannette D.
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Christopher M.
dc.contributor.authorAggarwal, Ajay K.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:43:53Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:43:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of delivering sustained improvements in cancer outcome. To inform radiation therapy research policy and prioritization, we analyze the radiation therapy RCT landscape including comparison with trials of systemic therapies over the same period, with a specific focus on funding and disparities across income settings. Methods and Materials: This retrospective cohort study identified all phase 3 RCTs evaluating anticancer therapies published from 2014 to 2017. RCTs were classified according to anticancer modality and country of origin. Descriptive statistics were used to compare key characteristics of radiation therapy RCT studies according to study design characteristics, tumor types evaluated, types of intervention appraised, treatment intent and main funding sources. Results: The study cohort included 694 RCTs of which 64 were radiation therapy RCTs (9%) compared with 601 systemic therapy RCTs (87%). Among all radiation therapy RCTs, 47% of them focused on 2 areas of evaluation: (1) combining radiation therapy with systemic agents (25%) and (2) changes in dose fractionation (22%). The most common cancers studied were head and neck (22%), lung (22%), and breast (14%), with cervical cancer trials representing only 3% of the cohort. Among the radiation therapy RCTs, 33% of them met their primary endpoint, and 62% assessed interventions in the curative setting compared with 31% in systemic therapy RCTs. For their country locations, 77% of radiation therapy RCTs took place in high-income countries, 13% in low-and-middle-income countries, and 11% in both high-income and low-and-middle-income countries. For funding, 17% of radiation therapy RCTs received funding from industry compared with 79% of systemic therapy RCTs. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for greater investment in radiation therapy RCTs and the need to look at the disparities in conducting RCTs globally. The study emphases the urgent need for more capacity building for cancer clinical trials in low-and-middle-income countries and more sustainable funding sources. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.053
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85126883981
dc.identifier.pmid35151802
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30368
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trials as topic
dc.subjectClinical research
dc.subjectDiseases
dc.subjectFinance
dc.subjectRadiation
dc.subjectCohort studies
dc.subjectFunding sources
dc.subjectGlobal radiation
dc.subjectMethods and materials
dc.subjectMiddle-income countries
dc.subjectPrioritization
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectResearch policies
dc.subjectSystemic therapy
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBrachytherapy
dc.subjectBrain cancer
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectCancer radiotherapy
dc.subjectCancer research
dc.subjectCancer survival
dc.subjectCentral nervous system cancer
dc.subjectCohort analysis
dc.subjectColorectal cancer
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFunding
dc.subjectGlobal disease burden
dc.subjectHead and neck cancer
dc.subjectHighest income group
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectLiver cancer
dc.subjectLow income country
dc.subjectLung cancer
dc.subjectLymphoma
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle income country
dc.subjectOverall survival
dc.subjectProgression free survival
dc.subjectProstate cancer
dc.subjectRadiation dose fractionation
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.subjectRectum cancer
dc.subjectRetrospective study
dc.subjectTestis cancer
dc.subjectUterine cervix cancer
dc.subjectVulva cancer
dc.subjectNeoplasm
dc.subjectRadiotherapy
dc.titleIs Clinical Research Serving the Needs of the Global Cancer Burden? An Analysis of Contemporary Global Radiation Therapy Randomized Controlled Trials
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022-5534.pdf
Size:
1002.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format