Assessing the process and outcome of the development of practice guidelines and recommendations: PANELVIEW instrument development

dc.contributor.authorWiercioch, Wojtek
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorSantesso, Nancy A.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yuan
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Rebecca L.
dc.contributor.authorYepes-Nuñez, Juan Jose
dc.contributor.authorKowalski, Sérgio Cândido
dc.contributor.authorBaldeh, Tejan
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Reem A.
dc.contributor.authorLaisaar, Kaja Triin
dc.contributor.authorRaid, Ulla
dc.contributor.authorEtxeandia Ikobaltzeta, Itziar
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco-Labra, Alonso
dc.contributor.authorVentresca, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorNeumann, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorFalavigna, Maicon
dc.contributor.authorBrignardello-Petersen, Romina
dc.contributor.authorMorgano, Gian Paolo
dc.contributor.authorBrožek, Jan L.
dc.contributor.authorMcConnell, Meghan M.
dc.contributor.authorSchunëmann, Holger J.
dc.contributor.authorFalck-Ytter, Yngve T.
dc.contributor.authorFlorez, Ivan D.
dc.contributor.authorQaseem, Amir
dc.contributor.authorRosenfeld, Richard M.
dc.contributor.authorRobbins, Craig W.
dc.contributor.authorThornton, Judith
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:00:39Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:00:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations may be affected by flaws in the process, inappropriate panel member selection or conduct, conflicts of interest and other factors. To our knowledge, no validated tool exists to evaluate guideline development from the perspective of those directly involved in the process. Our objective was to develop and validate a universal tool, the PANELVIEW instrument, to assess guideline processes, methods and outcomes from the perspective of the participating guideline panellists and group members. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search and surveys of guideline groups (identified through contacting international organizations and convenience sampling of working panels) to inform item generation. Subsequent groups of guideline methodologists and panellists reviewed items for face validity and missing items. We used surveys, interviews and expert review for item reduction and phrasing. For reliability assessment and feedback, we tested the PANELVIEW tool in 8 international guideline groups. RESULTS: We surveyed 62 members from 13 guideline panels, contacted 19 organizations and reviewed 20 source documents to generate items. Fifty-three additional key informants provided feedback about phrasing of the items and response options. We reduced the number of items from 95 to 34 across domains that included administration, training, conflict of interest, group dynamics, chairing, evidence synthesis, formulating recommendations and publication. The tool takes about 10 minutes to complete and showed acceptable measurement properties. INTERPRETATION: The PANELVIEW instrument fills a gap by enabling guideline organizations to involve clinicians, patients and other participants in evaluating their guideline processes. The tool can inform quality improvement of existing or new guideline programs, focusing on insight into and transparency of the guideline development process, methods and outcomes. © 2020 Joule Inc. or its licensors.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200193
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85092311478
dc.identifier.pmid33020121
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31421
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCanadian Medical Association
dc.relation.ispartofCMAJ
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFeedback
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectOutcome and process assessment, health care
dc.subjectPractice guidelines as topic
dc.subjectReproducibility of results
dc.subjectSurveys and questionnaires
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectClinical assessment
dc.subjectConflict of interest
dc.subjectConvenience sample
dc.subjectFace validity
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGroup dynamics
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectInternational organization
dc.subjectInterview
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectOutcome assessment
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectSynthesis
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectTotal quality management
dc.subjectFeedback system
dc.subjectPractice guideline
dc.subjectQuestionnaire
dc.subjectReproducibility
dc.titleAssessing the process and outcome of the development of practice guidelines and recommendations: PANELVIEW instrument development
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-6398.pdf
Size:
83.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format