Distance to alveolar crestal bone: a critical factor in the success of orthodontic mini-implants
| dc.contributor.author | Haddad, Ramzi V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saadeh, Maria E. | |
| dc.contributor.department | Dentofacial Medicine | |
| dc.contributor.department | Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Medicine (FM) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T12:21:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T12:21:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: To evaluate the success rate of orthodontic mini-implant (MI) in relation to implant characteristics, mainly implant distance to alveolar crestal bone (AC) and root proximity (RP) to adjacent teeth. Methods: Two hundred sixty MIs (209 in maxilla, 51 in mandible) were categorized into success (n = 229) and failure (n = 31) groups. Distances from MI to the most adjacent tooth (DT) and to AC level (DC) were measured on periapical radiographs taken with the orthoradial projection technique. Appropriate statistical tests (chi-square, t test, logistic regression) were applied. Results: DC measurements were statistically significantly greater in the success group (7.46 ± 1.7 mm) compared to 3.43 ± 0.81 mm in the failure group. Root proximity was not associated with miniscrew failure. Patient age, mini-implant site, and DC were significant predictors of mini-implant failure (p < 0.001), which decreased significantly with increasing age (Coef = − 0.345; p = 0.013) and when the mini-implant was placed between premolars (p = 0.028) or between premolar and first molar (p = 0.045). The probability of failure also decreased with increasing DC distance (Coef = − 3.595; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The distance to alveolar crest was strongly associated with long-term stability. More apical placement of the MI from the crest would be compatible with a denser and thicker bucco-lingual/palatal bone level. © 2019, The Author(s). | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-019-0273-1 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85065703582 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 31081528 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/34481 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Progress in Orthodontics | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Alveolar crestal bone | |
| dc.subject | Orthodontic mini-implants | |
| dc.subject | Root proximity | |
| dc.subject | Alveolar process | |
| dc.subject | Dental implants | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Mandible | |
| dc.subject | Maxilla | |
| dc.subject | Molar | |
| dc.subject | Adult | |
| dc.subject | Alveolar crest | |
| dc.subject | Article | |
| dc.subject | Bone density | |
| dc.subject | Device failure analysis | |
| dc.subject | Device safety | |
| dc.subject | Female | |
| dc.subject | Human | |
| dc.subject | Major clinical study | |
| dc.subject | Male | |
| dc.subject | Molar tooth | |
| dc.subject | Orthodontics | |
| dc.subject | Panoramic radiography | |
| dc.subject | Premolar tooth | |
| dc.subject | Priority journal | |
| dc.subject | Retrospective study | |
| dc.subject | Tooth periapical disease | |
| dc.subject | Tooth radiography | |
| dc.subject | Young adult | |
| dc.subject | Alveolar bone | |
| dc.subject | Tooth implant | |
| dc.title | Distance to alveolar crestal bone: a critical factor in the success of orthodontic mini-implants | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1