Post-Oncologic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Mesh Versus Autologous Tissue
| dc.contributor.author | Karami, Reem A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ghieh, Fadi M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ibrahim, Amir E. | |
| dc.contributor.department | Surgery | |
| dc.contributor.department | Division of Plastic Surgery | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Medicine (FM) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T12:13:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T12:13:18Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose of Review: The aim of this review is to summarize and sum up the recent evidence on the topic of abdominal wall reconstruction post oncologic resection, comparing the use of mesh versus autologous reconstruction. Recent Findings: Recent findings show a more accepting approach towards more complex reconstructions that aim at a dynamic and robust abdominal wall reconstruction. Musculocutaneous free flaps using the anterolateral thigh flap, with a vastus lateralis, or the latissimus dorsi flap are being used more for replacing musculo-fascial and full-thickness defects to restore abdominal domain. Those autologous reconstructions are best combined with a mesh for robust musculo-fascial layer closure. Different mesh options are available for different cases depending on defect and the contamination status of the wound. Summary: Post-oncologic abdominal wall reconstruction is a complex procedure that should be well planned in multidisciplinary teams. The surgical options should be set up on a case-by-case basis weighing the different benefits and risks of autologous, mesh, or combined reconstruction. The more robust the reconstruction, the less complications encountered, especially with hernia formation rates. © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-020-00272-4 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85088998030 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/33012 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Springer | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Current Surgery Reports | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Abdominal wall defects | |
| dc.subject | Abdominal wall reconstruction | |
| dc.subject | Abdominal wall tumors | |
| dc.subject | Oncologic resection | |
| dc.subject | Abdominal surgery | |
| dc.subject | Abdominal wall defect | |
| dc.subject | Abdominal wound closure | |
| dc.subject | Abdominoplasty | |
| dc.subject | Anterolateral thigh flap | |
| dc.subject | Computed tomographic angiography | |
| dc.subject | Computer assisted tomography | |
| dc.subject | Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans | |
| dc.subject | Free tissue graft | |
| dc.subject | Human | |
| dc.subject | Myocutaneous flap | |
| dc.subject | Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging | |
| dc.subject | Reconstructive surgery | |
| dc.subject | Review | |
| dc.subject | Risk factor | |
| dc.subject | Skin graft | |
| dc.subject | Skin transplantation | |
| dc.title | Post-Oncologic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Mesh Versus Autologous Tissue | |
| dc.type | Review |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1