Effect of Lowering the Dialysate Temperature in Chronic Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Reem A.
dc.contributor.authorBdair, Fadi M.
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorGarg, Amit X.
dc.contributor.authorThiessen-Philbrook, Heather R.
dc.contributor.authorSalameh, Hasan J.
dc.contributor.authorKisra, Sood
dc.contributor.authorNesrallah, Gihad
dc.contributor.authorAl-Jaishi, Ahmed A.
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Parth
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Payal
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Ahmad A.
dc.contributor.authorSchunëmann, Holger J.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:48:32Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:48:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lowering the dialysate temperature may improve outcomes for patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. We reviewed the reported benefits and harms of lower temperature dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register, OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Pubmed until April 15, 2015. We reviewed the reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. We included all randomized, controlled trials that evaluated the effect of reduced temperature dialysis versus standard temperature dialysis in adult patients receiving chronic hemodialysis. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess confidence in the estimates of effect (i.e., the quality of evidence). We conducted meta-analyses using random effects models. RESULTS: Twenty-six trials were included, consisting of a total of 484 patients. Compared with standard temperature dialysis, reduced temperature dialysis significantly reduced the rate of intradialytic hypotension by 70% (95% confidence interval, 49% to 89%) and significantly increased intradialytic mean arterial pressure by 12 mmHg (95% confidence interval, 8 to 16 mmHg). Symptoms of discomfort occurred 2.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 9.82) times more often with reduced temperature compared with standard temperature dialysis. The effect on dialysis adequacy was not significantly different, with a Kt/V mean difference of -0.05 (95% confidence interval, -0.09 to 0.01). Small sample sizes, loss to follow-up, and a lack of appropriate blinding in some trials reduced confidence in the estimates of effect. None of the trials reported long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving chronic hemodialysis, reduced temperature dialysis may reduce the rate of intradialytic hypotension and increase intradialytic mean arterial pressure. High-quality, large, multicenter, randomized trials are needed to determine whether reduced temperature dialysis affects patient mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04580415
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84960087508
dc.identifier.pmid26712807
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30823
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Nephrology
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
dc.sourceMedline
dc.subjectArterial pressure
dc.subjectChi-square distribution
dc.subjectCold temperature/adverse effects
dc.subjectHemodialysis solutions/adverse effects/therapeutic use
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHypertension/etiology/physiopathology
dc.subjectHypotension/etiology/physiopathology/prevention & control
dc.subjectOdds ratio
dc.subjectRenal dialysis/adverse effects/methods
dc.subjectRenal insufficiency, chronic/diagnosis/therapy
dc.subjectRisk factors
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectChronic hemodialysis
dc.subjectCold temperature
dc.subjectDialysis
dc.subjectDialysis solutions
dc.subjectEnd stage renal disease
dc.subjectFollow-up studies
dc.subjectHemodialysis
dc.subjectHypotension
dc.subjectRenal dialysis
dc.titleEffect of Lowering the Dialysate Temperature in Chronic Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9661.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format