Cryolipolysis (CLL) for Reduction of Localized Subcutaneous Fat: Review of the Literature and an Evidence-Based Analysis

dc.contributor.authorAtiyeh, Bishara Shafic
dc.contributor.authorFadul, Romeu R.
dc.contributor.authorChahine, Fadl M.
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.contributor.departmentDivision of Plastic Surgery
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:13:09Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:13:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In recent years, cryolipolysis (CLL), a noninvasive approach based upon the inherent sensitivity of adipocytes to cold injury, has emerged. However, it is not clear whether available evidence to date about its efficacy justifies aggressive marketing and extensive widespread application by many practitioners without well-defined indications or objectives of treatment. The current review is intended to evaluate available evidence regarding CLL mechanisms of action and its efficacy not only in fat reducing but also in its ability to result in an aesthetically optimal outcome. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus computerized medical bibliographic database was conducted with the search terms “cryolipolysis,” “lipocryolysis,” and “cool sculpting.” Selection criteria included all matched reports with the search terms in their titles. Results: Thirty-two reports matched the inclusion criteria of this review. Five experimental studies were identified and included to further supplement the discussion. Conclusion: Most reports about CLL included in this review lacked rigorous scientific methodology in study design or in outcome measurement. Serious concerns about integrity of many of these reports, particularly with respect to validity of photographic outcome documentation in addition to objectivity, conflict of interest issues, and commercial bias, have been expressed. Further research should be encouraged to prove with methodological rigor positive effects of this treatment modality and to determine categories of patients in whom most favorable outcomes might be expected. Level of Evidence III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. © 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01869-x
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85088305540
dc.identifier.pmid32696167
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32979
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofAesthetic Plastic Surgery
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBody contouring
dc.subjectCryolipolysis
dc.subjectLipocryolysis
dc.subjectNon-invasive procedure
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectObesity
dc.subjectReconstructive surgical procedures
dc.subjectSubcutaneous fat
dc.subjectTreatment outcome
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectReconstructive surgery
dc.titleCryolipolysis (CLL) for Reduction of Localized Subcutaneous Fat: Review of the Literature and an Evidence-Based Analysis
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-6450.pdf
Size:
220.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections