Decentralization of solid waste management services in rural Lebanon: Barriers and opportunities

dc.contributor.authorAbed Al Ahad, Mary
dc.contributor.authorChalak, Ali
dc.contributor.authorFares, Souha A.
dc.contributor.authorMardigian, Patil
dc.contributor.authorHabib, Rima R.
dc.contributor.departmentEnvironmental Health (ENHL)
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Agriculture
dc.contributor.departmentHSON
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences (FAFS)
dc.contributor.facultyRafic Hariri School of Nursing (HSON)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:34:20Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:34:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractRapid urbanization, closure of dumps, and insufficient infrastructure funding in Lebanon have resulted in improper municipal solid waste management (MSWM), creating a continuing trash crisis in recent years. In Beirut and Mount Lebanon, MSWM was carried out in centralized waste processing and disposal facilities operated by the government. The trash crisis and failure of the centralized system prompted several municipal authorities to decentralize MSWM by establishing local facilities, paid by the council taxes charged to beneficiary households. To study the feasibility of decentralized MSWM, a survey of 228 households in a rural village in Lebanon explored households’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a local MSWM service. For data analysis, a multivariate Tobit model was used to examine the determinants of the WTP amount. Results showed that 79% of surveyed households in the studied village were willing to support local MSWM improvements by contributing an average yearly fee of US$48, representing a 30% increase in their current council taxes. Analysis showed a significant positive association between the WTP amount and the household monthly income level, the residents perceived needs for urgency to act on solid waste management, and the households’ responsibility to be involved in MSWM. An interview with the municipality mayor later revealed that financial, technical, and land resources are lacking to enable consideration of a decentralized project for MSWM in the village. Municipalities in rural areas have limited resources and are unable to sustain a decentralized MSWM service unless adjacent towns join effort in supporting and financing MSWM initiatives. © The Author(s) 2020.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20905115
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85081667664
dc.identifier.pmid32090703
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/28055
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofWaste Management and Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDecentralization
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectMunicipal solid waste management
dc.subjectRural areas
dc.subjectUser fees
dc.subjectWillingness to pay
dc.subjectCities
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPolitics
dc.subjectRefuse disposal
dc.subjectSolid waste
dc.subjectWaste management
dc.subjectEconomic and social effects
dc.subjectFinance
dc.subjectPlant shutdowns
dc.subjectSurveys
dc.subjectWaste disposal
dc.subjectCentralized systems
dc.subjectDisposal facilities
dc.subjectMunicipal authorities
dc.subjectRapid urbanizations
dc.subjectUser fee
dc.subjectHousehold income
dc.subjectRural area
dc.subjectUrbanization
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectData analysis
dc.subjectFeasibility study
dc.subjectHousehold
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectInterview
dc.subjectMunicipal solid waste
dc.subjectResident
dc.subjectSolid waste management
dc.subjectTax
dc.subjectCity
dc.titleDecentralization of solid waste management services in rural Lebanon: Barriers and opportunities
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-6766.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format