Antiphospholipid antibodies and autoimmune haemolytic anaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorAmes, Paul R.J.
dc.contributor.authorMerashli, Mira
dc.contributor.authorBucci, Tommaso
dc.contributor.authorPastori, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorPignatelli, Pasquale
dc.contributor.authorArcaro, Alessia
dc.contributor.authorGentile, Fabrizio
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:56:42Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:56:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) has never been systematically addressed. The aim of this study is to assess the link between aPL and AIHA in adult systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). This study performed an EMBASE/PubMed search from inception to June 2019 and meta-analysis using Peto’s odds ratios. The pooled prevalence (PP) of IgG/IgM anticardiolipin (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) was greater in AIHA +ve than AIHA –ve patients (34.7% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.03; 33.3% vs. 21.8%, p < 0.0001; 20.9% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.01). The PP of AIHA was greater in: (1) IgG and IgM aCL +ve than-ve patients (21.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.001 and 18.7% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.0001), (2) in SLE related APS than in primary APS patients (22.8% vs. 3.9% p < 0.0001), (3) in APS +ve than APS-ve SLE patients (23.2% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.01), and (4) in thrombotic APS than non-thrombotic APS/SLE patients (26.8% vs. 10%, p = 0.03). The PP of IgG/IgM aCL and LA was greater in DAT +ve than DAT-ve patients (42.4% vs. 12.8%, p < 0.0001; 26.2% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.03 and 29.2% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.004 respectively). It was found that AIHA prevalence is maximal in SLE with aPL/APS, low-moderate in SLE without aPL and minimal in PAPS. Moreover, AIHA is rightly included among the classification criteria for SLE but not for APS/aPL. The significance of an isolated DAT positivity remains unclear in this setting. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21114120
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85086108933
dc.identifier.pmid32527000
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31263
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAntiglobulin test
dc.subjectAntiphospholipid antibodies
dc.subjectAutoimmune haemolytic anaemia
dc.subjectAnemia, hemolytic, autoimmune
dc.subjectAntibodies, antiphospholipid
dc.subjectAntiphospholipid syndrome
dc.subjectCoombs test
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLupus erythematosus, systemic
dc.subjectThrombosis
dc.subjectCardiolipin antibody
dc.subjectImmunoglobulin g
dc.subjectImmunoglobulin m
dc.subjectLupus anticoagulant
dc.subjectPhospholipid antibody
dc.subjectAutoimmune hemolytic anemia
dc.subjectClassification
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectEmbase
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectSystemic lupus erythematosus
dc.subjectBlood
dc.subjectComplication
dc.subjectImmunology
dc.subjectMeta analysis
dc.titleAntiphospholipid antibodies and autoimmune haemolytic anaemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-6724.pdf
Size:
3.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format