Automatic Thalamus Segmentation on Unenhanced 3D T1 Weighted Images: Comparison of Publicly Available Segmentation Methods in a Pediatric Population

dc.contributor.authorHannoun, S.
dc.contributor.authorTutunji, Rayyan
dc.contributor.authorEl Homsi, Maria
dc.contributor.authorSaaybi, Stephanie R.
dc.contributor.authorHourani, Roula G.
dc.contributor.departmentSpecialized Clinical Programs and Services
dc.contributor.departmentNeurology
dc.contributor.departmentDiagnostic Radiology
dc.contributor.departmentAbu-Haidar Neuroscience Institute (AHNI)
dc.contributor.departmentNehme and Therese Tohme Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Center
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:20:28Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:20:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe anatomical structure of the thalamus renders its segmentation on 3DT1 images harder due to its low tissue contrast, and not well-defined boundaries. We aimed to investigate the differences in the precision of publicly available segmentation techniques on 3DT1 images acquired at 1.5 T and 3 T machines compared to the thalamic manual segmentation in a pediatric population. Sixty-eight subjects were recruited between the ages of one and 18 years. Manual segmentation of the thalamus was done by three junior raters, and then corrected by an experienced rater. Automated segmentation was then performed with FSL Anat, FIRST, FreeSurfer, MRICloud, and volBrain. A mask of the intersections between the manual and automated segmentation was created for each algorithm to measure the degree of similitude (DICE) with the manual segmentation. The DICE score was shown to be highest using volBrain in all subjects (0.873 ± 0.036), as well as in the 1.5 T (0.871 ± 0.037), and the 3 T (0.875 ± 0.036) groups. FSL-Anat and FIRST came in second and third. MRICloud was shown to have the lowest DICE values. When comparing 1.5 T to 3 T groups, no significant differences were observed in all segmentation methods, except for FIRST (p = 0.038). Age was not a significant predictor of DICE in any of the measurements. When using automated segmentation, the best option in both field strengths would be the use of volBrain. This will achieve results closest to the manual segmentation while reducing the amount of time and computing power needed by researchers. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-018-9408-7
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85058616484
dc.identifier.pmid30552549
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/34304
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHumana Press Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroinformatics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectManual and automated segmentation
dc.subjectPediatric imaging
dc.subjectSimilarity index
dc.subjectThalamus
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectChild, preschool
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImage processing, computer-assisted
dc.subjectImaging, three-dimensional
dc.subjectInfant
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNeuroimaging
dc.subjectAlgorithm
dc.subjectAnatomy and histology
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectImage processing
dc.subjectNuclear magnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectPreschool child
dc.subjectProcedures
dc.subjectThree-dimensional imaging
dc.titleAutomatic Thalamus Segmentation on Unenhanced 3D T1 Weighted Images: Comparison of Publicly Available Segmentation Methods in a Pediatric Population
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019-7436.pdf
Size:
1.23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format