Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBazi, Tony M.
dc.contributor.departmentObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:08:05Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:08:05Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractA scholarly peer review is the process whereby referees scrutinize research work or a manuscript within their field of expertise and decide on its acceptability for publication in a journal or scientific proceeding. Ideally, peer review is impartial. Among the many models of peer review, the single blind is currently the most adopted model in scientific journals. The double-blind model has been claimed to decrease bias, despite some difficulty in implementation. © 2019, The International Urogynecological Association.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04187-2
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85076731627
dc.identifier.pmid31820012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31709
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Urogynecology Journal
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDouble-blind
dc.subjectInternational
dc.subjectPeer review
dc.subjectPublication
dc.subjectResearch
dc.subjectSingle-blind
dc.subjectDouble-blind method
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPublishing
dc.subjectSingle-blind method
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDouble blind procedure
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectSingle blind procedure
dc.titlePeer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind?
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-6909.pdf
Size:
187.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Obstetrics and Gynecology