Validity of Categories Related to Gender Identity in ICD-11 and DSM-5 Among Transgender Individuals who Seek Gender-Affirming Medical Procedures
| dc.contributor.author | Robles-García, Rebeca | |
| dc.contributor.author | Keeley, Jared Wayne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vega-Ramirez, Hamid | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cruz-Islas, Jeremy Bernardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez-Pérez, Víctor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sharan, Pratap | |
| dc.contributor.author | Poornima, Shivani | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rao, Ravindra | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lobato, Maria Inês Rodrigues | |
| dc.contributor.author | Soll, Bianca Machado Borba | |
| dc.contributor.author | Askevis-Leherpeux, Françoise | |
| dc.contributor.author | Roelandt, Jean Luc | |
| dc.contributor.author | Campbell, Megan M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Grobler, Gerhard P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stein, Dan J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khoury, Brigitte A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | El-Khoury, Joseph R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fresan, Ana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Medina-Mora, M. E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Reed, Geoffrey M. | |
| dc.contributor.department | Psychiatry | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Medicine (FM) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T12:12:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T12:12:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background/Objective: The most recent versions of the two main mental disorders classifications—the World Health Organization's ICD-11 and the American Psychiatric Association's DSM–5—differ substantially in their diagnostic categories related to transgender identity. ICD-11 gender incongruence (GI), in contrast to DSM-5 gender dysphoria (GD), is explicitly not a mental disorder; neither distress nor dysfunction is a required feature. The objective was compared ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic requirements in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, discriminability and ability to predict the use of gender-affirming medical procedures. Method: A total of 649 of transgender adults in six countries completed a retrospective structured interview. Results: Using ROC analysis, sensitivity of the diagnostic requirements was equivalent for both systems, but ICD-11 showed greater specificity than DSM-5. Regression analyses indicated that history of hormones and/or surgery was predicted by variables that are an intrinsic aspect of GI/GD more than by distress and dysfunction. IRT analyses showed that the ICD-11 diagnostic formulation was more parsimonious and contained more information about caseness than the DSM-5 model. Conclusions: This study supports the ICD-11 position that GI/GD is not a mental disorder; additional diagnostic requirements of distress and/or dysfunction in DSM-5 reduce the predictive power of the diagnostic model. © 2021 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100281 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/32698 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Asociacion Espanola de Psicologia Conductual | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Dsm-5 | |
| dc.subject | Ex post facto study | |
| dc.subject | Gender dysphoria | |
| dc.subject | Gender incongruence | |
| dc.subject | Icd-11 | |
| dc.title | Validity of Categories Related to Gender Identity in ICD-11 and DSM-5 Among Transgender Individuals who Seek Gender-Affirming Medical Procedures | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1