Routine feedback of test results to participants in clinic- and survey-based surveillance of HIV
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
World Health Organization
Abstract
Surveillance for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in low- and middle-income countries started in the 1980s. However, the questions of whether the results of HIV tests should be given to participants, and if so how, has still not been resolved. In the absence of effective treatment, it was considered acceptable to withhold results from HIV-positive participants. However, when antiretroviral treatment is available, some argue for beneficence – that it is the researcher’s duty to return the test results to all those who provide samples for surveillance. The corollary is that only participants who wish to receive their test results would be eligible to participate in surveys. Others argue for autonomy – that to obtain a more representative result for the general population, surveys should not exclude participants who do not wish to receive their test results. This round table discussion takes a closer look at those two arguments. We believe that the global community should work towards routine feedback of HIV surveillance while ensuring that participants receive and understand their test results. © 2015 World Health Organization. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Anti-retroviral agents, Attitude of health personnel, Female, Hiv infections, Hiv seropositivity, Humans, Informed consent, Interprofessional relations, Male, Patient rights, Physician-patient relations, Population surveillance, United nations, Human immunodeficiency virus, Antiretrovirus agent, Disease treatment, Feedback mechanism, Health survey, Low income population, Participatory approach, Spatiotemporal analysis, Acquired immune deficiency syndrome, Article, Disease eradication, Disease surveillance, Feedback system, Hiv test, Human immunodeficiency virus infection, Infection control, Participant observation, Point of care testing, Virus transmission, World health organization, Doctor patient relation, Ethics, Health personnel attitude, Human, Patient right, Psychology, Public relations