Life cycle assessment and cost of a seawater reverse osmosis plant operated with different energy sources

dc.contributor.authorNajjar, Elena
dc.contributor.authorAl-Hindi, Mahmoud
dc.contributor.authorMassoud, May A.
dc.contributor.authorSaad, Walid S.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentEnvironmental Health (ENHL)
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:26:34Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:26:34Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractSeawater desalination plants consume significant amounts of energy sourced primarily from fossil fuels, leading to significant environmental impact. Life Cycle Assessment has been applied to desalination systems powered by a single renewable energy source with the underlying assumption of sufficiency of power supply. However, in several locations in the world the intermittent nature of these renewable sources prevents a full reliance on a single source and necessitates a combined fossil fuel-renewable energy mix. This study addresses this issue by performing life cycle assessment and preliminary costing analysis for different renewable-energy-grid combinations (photovoltaic-grid, wind-grid and anaerobic digestion-grid). Whilst the grid-anaerobic digestion and grid-photovoltaic scenarios provided significant improvements in all environmental impact categories, the grid-wind energy option resulted in the highest reduction whereby a 60% decrease in carbon footprint was observed. The unit product cost for the environmentally optimum grid-anaerobic digestion scheme was the lowest at 0.94 $/m3, while the unit product cost for the grid-photovoltaic scheme was the most expensive at 1.47 $/m3. An integrated photovoltaic-wind-anaerobic digestion scheme may offer further reduction in environmental impact and a potentially lower unit product cost. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115964
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85135063939
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/26640
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Conversion and Management
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnaerobic digestion
dc.subjectDesalination
dc.subjectLife cycle assessment
dc.subjectPhotovoltaic energy
dc.subjectSeawater reverse osmosis
dc.subjectWind energy
dc.subjectCarbon footprint
dc.subjectCosts
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact
dc.subjectFossil fuel power plants
dc.subjectFossil fuels
dc.subjectLife cycle
dc.subjectReverse osmosis
dc.subjectSeawater
dc.subjectWind power
dc.subject% reductions
dc.subjectDifferent energy sources
dc.subjectPhotovoltaics
dc.subjectRenewable energies
dc.subjectSeawater desalination plants
dc.subjectSeawater reverse osmosis plants
dc.subjectUnit product cost
dc.titleLife cycle assessment and cost of a seawater reverse osmosis plant operated with different energy sources
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022-5559.pdf
Size:
13.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format