Life cycle assessment and cost of a seawater reverse osmosis plant operated with different energy sources
| dc.contributor.author | Najjar, Elena | |
| dc.contributor.author | Al-Hindi, Mahmoud | |
| dc.contributor.author | Massoud, May A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saad, Walid S. | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering | |
| dc.contributor.department | Environmental Health (ENHL) | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA) | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T11:26:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T11:26:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Seawater desalination plants consume significant amounts of energy sourced primarily from fossil fuels, leading to significant environmental impact. Life Cycle Assessment has been applied to desalination systems powered by a single renewable energy source with the underlying assumption of sufficiency of power supply. However, in several locations in the world the intermittent nature of these renewable sources prevents a full reliance on a single source and necessitates a combined fossil fuel-renewable energy mix. This study addresses this issue by performing life cycle assessment and preliminary costing analysis for different renewable-energy-grid combinations (photovoltaic-grid, wind-grid and anaerobic digestion-grid). Whilst the grid-anaerobic digestion and grid-photovoltaic scenarios provided significant improvements in all environmental impact categories, the grid-wind energy option resulted in the highest reduction whereby a 60% decrease in carbon footprint was observed. The unit product cost for the environmentally optimum grid-anaerobic digestion scheme was the lowest at 0.94 $/m3, while the unit product cost for the grid-photovoltaic scheme was the most expensive at 1.47 $/m3. An integrated photovoltaic-wind-anaerobic digestion scheme may offer further reduction in environmental impact and a potentially lower unit product cost. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115964 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85135063939 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/26640 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Energy Conversion and Management | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Anaerobic digestion | |
| dc.subject | Desalination | |
| dc.subject | Life cycle assessment | |
| dc.subject | Photovoltaic energy | |
| dc.subject | Seawater reverse osmosis | |
| dc.subject | Wind energy | |
| dc.subject | Carbon footprint | |
| dc.subject | Costs | |
| dc.subject | Environmental impact | |
| dc.subject | Fossil fuel power plants | |
| dc.subject | Fossil fuels | |
| dc.subject | Life cycle | |
| dc.subject | Reverse osmosis | |
| dc.subject | Seawater | |
| dc.subject | Wind power | |
| dc.subject | % reductions | |
| dc.subject | Different energy sources | |
| dc.subject | Photovoltaics | |
| dc.subject | Renewable energies | |
| dc.subject | Seawater desalination plants | |
| dc.subject | Seawater reverse osmosis plants | |
| dc.subject | Unit product cost | |
| dc.title | Life cycle assessment and cost of a seawater reverse osmosis plant operated with different energy sources | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1