An Experimentally Validated Combined Stiffness Formulation for a Finite Domain Considering Volume Fraction, Shape, Orientation, and Location of a Single Inclusion

dc.contributor.authorHage, Ilige S.
dc.contributor.authorHamade, Ramsey F.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:32:21Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:32:21Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis work characterizes the stiffness of a finite domain containing one (biaxial ellipsoidal) void due to the combined effect of inclusion's attributes: (1) size or volume fraction, VF, (2) shape or aspect ratio, AR, (3) angular orientation, and (4) location (position) within the matrix. The values and ranges of these ellipsoidal inclusion attributes are varied according to a matrix developed using design of experiments (DOE). Modified Mori-Tanaka method combined with dual-eigenstrain method (interior and exterior eigenstrain methods) is used to determine the effective stiffness tensor of the composite domain. Employing the numerically calculated normalized axial modulus E11/Em values in SAS/STAT®, a nonlinear mathematical expression of E11/Em as function of the void's variables is arrived at Stiffness values found from the numerical homogenization scheme are experimentally corroborated using compression tests conducted on 3D-printed ABS cubes having a single ellipsoidal inclusion of various geometric attributes. In addition, finite element simulations were run of said uniaxial compression test cases to further validate the numerical homogenization results. Corroborated findings suggest that while the location of the inclusions in the matrix have no significant effect on normalized modulus E11/Em, the void's volume fraction has the largest effect where it decreases with VF. The effect of the void's orientation and elliptical aspect ratio are significant. E11/Em increases with AR at angles ranging from 0-30°; at 45°E11/Em are almost constant with AR, at angles of 60-90° values of E11/Em decrease with AR. As AR approaches unity, the effect of orientation decreases significantly. © 2018 World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1142/S1758825118500114
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85042221140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/27776
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWorld Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Applied Mechanics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectComposite
dc.subjectEffective stiffness
dc.subjectEshelby tensor
dc.subjectFem
dc.subjectHomogenization
dc.subject3d printers
dc.subjectAspect ratio
dc.subjectComposite materials
dc.subjectCompression testing
dc.subjectDesign of experiments
dc.subjectFinite element method
dc.subjectFunctions
dc.subjectHomogenization method
dc.subjectInclusions
dc.subjectLocation
dc.subjectStiffness
dc.subjectTensors
dc.subjectVoid fraction
dc.subjectVolume fraction
dc.subjectEffective stiffness tensors
dc.subjectEllipsoidal inclusions
dc.subjectFinite element simulations
dc.subjectMathematical expressions
dc.subjectNumerical homogenization
dc.subjectUni-axial compression tests
dc.subjectStiffness matrix
dc.titleAn Experimentally Validated Combined Stiffness Formulation for a Finite Domain Considering Volume Fraction, Shape, Orientation, and Location of a Single Inclusion
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018-4455.pdf
Size:
3.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format