Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments

dc.contributor.authorSantesso, Nancy A.
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco-Labra, Alonso
dc.contributor.authorLangendam, Miranda W.
dc.contributor.authorBrignardello-Petersen, Romina
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Reem A.
dc.contributor.authorHeus, Pauline
dc.contributor.authorLasserson, Toby J.
dc.contributor.authorOpiyo, Newton
dc.contributor.authorKunnamo, Ilkka
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, David J.
dc.contributor.authorGarner, Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorTreweek, Shaun P.
dc.contributor.authorTovey, David I.
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorTugwell, Peter S.L.
dc.contributor.authorBrožek, Jan L.
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Guyatt H.
dc.contributor.authorSchunëmann, Holger J.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:48:52Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:48:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is widely used and reliable and accurate for assessing the certainty in the body of health evidence. The GRADE working group has provided detailed guidance for assessing the certainty in the body of evidence in systematic reviews and health technology assessments (HTAs) and how to grade the strength of health recommendations. However, there is limited advice regarding how to maximize transparency of these judgments, in particular through explanatory footnotes or explanations in Summary of Findings tables and Evidence Profiles (GRADE evidence tables). METHODS: We conducted this study to define the essential attributes of useful explanations and to develop specific guidance for explanations associated with GRADE evidence tables. We used a sample of explanations according to their complexity, type of judgment involved, and appropriateness from a database of published GRADE evidence tables in Cochrane reviews and World Health Organization guidelines. We used an iterative process and group consensus to determine the attributes and develop guidance. RESULTS: Explanations in GRADE evidence tables should be concise, informative, relevant, easy to understand, and accurate. We provide general and domain-specific guidance to assist authors with achieving these desirable attributes in their explanations associated with GRADE evidence tables. CONCLUSIONS: Adhering to the general and GRADE domain-specific guidance should improve the quality of explanations associated with GRADE evidence tables, assist authors of systematic reviews, HTA reports, or guidelines with information that they can use in other parts of their evidence synthesis. This guidance will also support editorial evaluation of evidence syntheses using GRADE and provide a minimum quality standard of judgments across tables.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.12.006
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-84974652904
dc.identifier.pmid26796947
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/30849
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier USA
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
dc.sourceMedline
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectEvidence-based medicine
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInformation dissemination/methods
dc.subjectJudgment
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectResearch report/standards
dc.subjectReview literature as topic
dc.subjectTechnology assessment, biomedical
dc.subjectUncertainty
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectEvidence profile
dc.subjectExplanations
dc.subjectGrade
dc.subjectGradepro
dc.subjectGuidelines
dc.subjectLevels of evidence
dc.subjectSummary of findings table
dc.subjectSystematic reviews
dc.titleImproving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016-9487.pdf
Size:
238.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format