Life cycle assessment of desiccant – Dew point evaporative cooling systems with water reclamation for poultry houses in hot and humid climate

dc.contributor.authorHarrouz, Jean Paul
dc.contributor.authorKatramiz, Elvire
dc.contributor.authorGhali, Kamel Abou
dc.contributor.authorOuahrani, Djamel
dc.contributor.authorGhaddar, Nesreen K.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.facultyMaroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (MSFEA)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:33:19Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:33:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractDesiccant – dew point evaporative based cooling systems is known to be an effective system for the ventilation and cooling of poultry houses in hot and humid climates. However, they suffer from high water consumption that hinders their application in desert regions. In this work, it is proposed to integrate a water reclamation unit with the cooling system to produce water from the adsorbent's humid regeneration stream. The performance of the hybrid cooling and water reclamation unit is evaluated for two desiccants: conventional (silica gel), which is cheap but has low water capacity, and novel (MIL-101-Cr, a type of metal organic framework), which is expensive but has high water capacity. The system was sized, and its operation was optimized using both adsorbents for a case study of a typical poultry house module located in the predominantly hot and humid climate of Qatar. This is achieved by developing numerical models for the different system's subcomponents, which are then validated with the published data. An artificial neural network was trained using the numerical model of water adsorption to accelerate the computational time of the genetic algorithm used for the performance optimization. A lifecycle cost comparative analysis is conducted to determine the integrated system most cost-effective adsorbent. Over the entire cooling season, it was found that the hybrid system using MIL-101-Cr resulted in 17% and 48% reduction in the thermal and electrical energy consumption compared to the one using silica gel. This has offered thus a 27% lower operating cost with a payback period of 11 years using the current market price of MIL-101-Cr. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118419
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85127135630
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/27965
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Thermal Engineering
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDesiccant dehumidification
dc.subjectDew point indirect evaporative cooler
dc.subjectMetal organic framework
dc.subjectPoultry house ventilation
dc.subjectWater adsorption
dc.subjectCost benefit analysis
dc.subjectCost effectiveness
dc.subjectEvaporation
dc.subjectEvaporative cooling systems
dc.subjectGenetic algorithms
dc.subjectHumidity control
dc.subjectHybrid systems
dc.subjectLife cycle
dc.subjectNeural networks
dc.subjectNumerical models
dc.subjectOrganometallics
dc.subjectSilica gel
dc.subjectThermoelectric equipment
dc.subjectDesiccants dew points
dc.subjectDewpoint
dc.subjectHot and humid climate
dc.subjectIndirect evaporative cooler
dc.subjectMetalorganic frameworks (mofs)
dc.subjectPoultry house
dc.subjectEnergy utilization
dc.titleLife cycle assessment of desiccant – Dew point evaporative cooling systems with water reclamation for poultry houses in hot and humid climate
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022-5524.pdf
Size:
5.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format