Examining the feasibility and acceptability of valuing the arabic version of SF-6D in a Lebanese population

dc.contributor.authorKharroubi, Samer A.
dc.contributor.authorBeyh, Yara S.
dc.contributor.authorDiab El-Harakeh, Marwa H.
dc.contributor.authorDawoud, Dalia M.
dc.contributor.authorRowen, Donna Louise
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, John E.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences (FAFS)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:19:17Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:19:17Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The SF-6D is a preference-based measure of health developed to generate utility values from the SF-36. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using the standard gamble (SG) technique to generate preference-based values for the Arabic version of SF-6D in a Lebanese population. Methods: The SF-6D was translated into Arabic using forward and backward translations. Forty-nine states defined by the SF-6D were selected using an orthogonal design and grouped into seven sets. A gender-occupation stratified sample of 126 Lebanese adults from the American University of Beirut were recruited to value seven states and the pits using SG. The sample size is appropriate for a pilot study, but smaller than the sample required for a full valuation study. Both interviewers and interviewees reported their understanding and effort levels in the SG tasks. Mean and individual level multivariate regression models were fitted to estimate preference weights for all SF-6D states. The models were compared with those estimated in the UK. Results: Interviewers reported few problems in completing SG tasks (0.8% with a lot of problems) and good respondent understanding (5.6% with little effort and concentration), and 25% of respondents reported the SG task was difficult. A total of 992 SG valuations were useable for econometric modeling. There was no significant change in the test– retest values from 21 subjects. The mean absolute errors in the mean and individual level models were 0.036 and 0.050, respectively, both of which were lower than the UK results. The random effects model adequately predicts the SG values, with the worst state having a value of 0.322 compared to 0.271 in the UK. Conclusion: This pilot confirmed that it was feasible and acceptable to generate preference values with the SG method for the Arabic SF-6D in a Lebanese population. However, further work is needed to extend this to a more representative population, and to explore why no utility values below zero were observed. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031037
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85079165432
dc.identifier.pmid32041284
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/24862
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectPreference-based measure
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectSf-6d
dc.subjectStandard gamble
dc.subjectValidation
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth status
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLanguage
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectModels, econometric
dc.subjectPilot projects
dc.subjectSample size
dc.subjectSurveys and questionnaires
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectUnited kingdom
dc.subjectArab world
dc.subjectFeasibility study
dc.subjectHealth impact
dc.subjectHealth risk
dc.subjectMedical geography
dc.subjectOccupational exposure
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectRegression analysis
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectGender
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectHuman experiment
dc.subjectHuman tissue
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectOccupation
dc.subjectPilot study
dc.subjectRemission
dc.subjectStratified sample
dc.subjectStatistical model
dc.subjectHealth
dc.titleExamining the feasibility and acceptability of valuing the arabic version of SF-6D in a Lebanese population
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-7039.pdf
Size:
781.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format