Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial

dc.contributor.authorEl Charif, Mohamad Hadi
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Zeina
dc.contributor.authorHoballah, Jamal Jawad
dc.contributor.authorKhalife, Mohamad Jawad
dc.contributor.authorSbaity, Eman
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T12:13:13Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T12:13:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground: Wound complications following midline laparotomies are common and the main source of postoperative morbidity including superficial or deep wound infection, skin dehiscence, fascia dehiscence, and incisional hernia. Abdominal closure complications are strongly associated with suture technique and material, in addition to other factors related to the patient and type of surgery performed. The traditional technique is to place the fascia sutures 1 cm apart and at least 1 cm away from the fascia edge. A Swedish study described a new technique of placing the sutures 5 mm apart and 5 mm away from the fascia edge, resulting in lower rates of abdominal wound complications. This study has a number of limitations. There is a need for improved quality evidence to convince the surgical community to change the closure technique of abdominal wounds aiming to reduce morbidity, which is exemplified in incisional hernias and other various postop complications. Methods: This is a 1:1 randomized, controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded, parallel design, superiority trial, with a primary endpoint of incisional hernia at 1 year. The study will be conducted at AUBMC over a 3-year period. Patients planned for a non-emergent midline laparotomy for general surgery or vascular procedure will be randomized to either fascia closure technique. In order to detect a drop of 12% in the incidence of incisional hernia, with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05, we will need to recruit 114 patients per arm. After adjusting for loss to follow-up, target recruitment is 274 subjects. We will compare both arms for the primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes, using chi-square or t test as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression will be done. Discussion: This trial will assess postop complications following abdominal midline wound closures via two different suturing techniques. This trial will generate evidence-based conclusions that will allow surgeons to assess the role of a new abdominal closure technique in decreasing short- and long-term postoperative complications, for a commonly performed procedure. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03527433. Registered on 17 May 2018 before starting participant enrollment. © 2020 The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04507-8
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85087534104
dc.identifier.pmid32616017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/32994
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofTrials
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAbdominal fascia closure
dc.subjectIncisional hernias
dc.subjectMidline laparotomies
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectWound suture
dc.subjectAbdominal wound closure techniques
dc.subjectDouble-blind method
dc.subjectElective surgical procedures
dc.subjectHernia, abdominal
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIncisional hernia
dc.subjectLaparotomy
dc.subjectLebanon
dc.subjectPostoperative complications
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trials as topic
dc.subjectSuture techniques
dc.subjectAbdominal wound closure
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectComparative effectiveness
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectElective surgery
dc.subjectEvidence based practice
dc.subjectEvisceration
dc.subjectFollow up
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectIncidence
dc.subjectIntermethod comparison
dc.subjectMorbidity
dc.subjectParallel design
dc.subjectPostoperative complication
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectSuture technique
dc.subjectWound complication
dc.subjectWound dehiscence
dc.subjectAbdominal wall hernia
dc.subjectAdverse event
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectDevices
dc.subjectDouble blind procedure
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.titleProtocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-3250.pdf
Size:
872.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections