Trauma center designation level and survival of patients with chest wall instability

dc.contributor.authorTraboulsy, Sarah I.
dc.contributor.authorBachir, Rana H.
dc.contributor.authorEl Sayed, Mazen J.
dc.contributor.departmentEmergency Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:41:58Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:41:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Chest wall instability is a potentially life-threatening condition that should be evaluated at a trauma center. While patients with chest wall instability are sent to different trauma center levels, the impact of this on outcomes has not been evaluated yet. This study examines survival to hospital discharge of patients with chest wall instability treated at different trauma center levels. Methods: This is an observational retrospective cohort study analyzed data from National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) 2017 dataset. The study sample consisted of adult patients who presented with chest wall instability or deformity and for whom the ED disposition was recorded. Descriptive analysis was carried out. Hospital information, patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, and dispositions were compared based on the main independent variable “trauma designation level. This was followed by LASSO regression to determine the impact of the trauma designation level on patients' survival after controlling for most of the extracted factors from NTDB to conduct this study. Results: The study sample consisted of 1172 patients sustaining chest wall instability or deformity. Most patients were males (78.2%) and had a median age of 52 years. Most were taken to level I (51.5%) or level II (43.2%) trauma centers. The overall survival to hospital discharge was 78.2%. After adjusting for confounders, no difference in patients' survival was noticed between those taken to level II [OR = 1.000; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.976–1.025] or III [OR = 1.000; 95% CI: 0.993–1.007] trauma centers and those taken to level I centers. Conclusion: Survival rates for patients having chest wall instability were similar when transported to level II or level III versus level I centers. This finding can help guide pre-hospital field triage criteria for this specific type of injury and highlights the need for more outcome research in organized trauma systems. © 2022
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2022.09.031
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85139358143
dc.identifier.pmid36201972
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/29919
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherW.B. Saunders
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectChest wall instability
dc.subjectOutcome
dc.subjectPrehospital triage
dc.subjectSurvival
dc.subjectTrauma designation level
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInjury severity score
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle aged
dc.subjectRetrospective studies
dc.subjectSurvival rate
dc.subjectThoracic wall
dc.subjectTrauma centers
dc.subjectTriage
dc.subjectWounds and injuries
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBlood transfusion
dc.subjectClinical feature
dc.subjectCohort analysis
dc.subjectCommunity hospital
dc.subjectComorbidity
dc.subjectConfounding variable
dc.subjectControlled study
dc.subjectDeformity
dc.subjectDemography
dc.subjectEmergency health service
dc.subjectFalling
dc.subjectGlasgow coma scale
dc.subjectHemodynamics
dc.subjectHospital discharge
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectIndependent variable
dc.subjectInjury scale
dc.subjectLeast absolute shrinkage and selection operator
dc.subjectMajor clinical study
dc.subjectObservational study
dc.subjectOutcomes research
dc.subjectPatient triage
dc.subjectRetrospective study
dc.subjectSystolic blood pressure
dc.subjectThorax deformity
dc.subjectTraffic
dc.subjectInjury
dc.subjectThorax wall
dc.titleTrauma center designation level and survival of patients with chest wall instability
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022-1302.pdf
Size:
726.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format