Balancing act between quantitative and qualitative image quality between nonionic iodinated dimer and monomer at various vessel sizes during computed tomography: A phantom study
Loading...
Files
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Institute of Physics
Abstract
Purpose: Investigate the impact of nonionic dimer and monomer on iodine quantification in different vessel sizes when employing a vascular specific phantom and varying iodinated contrast media (ICM) concentrations during computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: We created a vascular specific phantom (30 cm) to simulate human blood vessel diameters (25 cylinders of different diameters: 10 × 9mm, 10 × 12mm and 5 × 21mm). The phantom was filled with two ICM separately: Group: Iohexol(monomer)350 mg ml-1 and B: Iodixanol(Dimer)320 mg ml-1. Cylinders of same size were filled with increasing ICM concentration(10%-100%) while large cylinders were filled in quartiles(25%-100%). Phantom was scanned with different tube potential (80-140kVp), current (50-400mAs), reconstruction method [filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid-based iterative reconstruction (HBIR) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR)] for each ICM. Chi-square was employed to compare mean opacification, contrast/noise ratio (CNR) and noise. Qualitative analysis was assessed by Visual grading characteristic (VGC) and Cohens-kappa analyses. Results: At 80 and140kVp significant difference in opacification between Group A (2054 ± 1040HU and 1696 ± 1027HU) and B (2169 ± 1105HU and 1568 ± 1034HU) was demonstrated (p < 0.001). However, at 100 and 120kVp no difference was noted (p > 0.05). When comparing image noise, it was higher in Group A compared to B (p < 0.05). CNR was higher in Group B (119.99 ± 126.10HU) than A (107.09 ± 102.56HU) (p < 0.0001). VGC: Group A outperformed B in image opacification in all vessel sizes and ICM concentrations except at medium vessels with concentration group 2(0.4-0.6 mg ml-1). Cohens'-kappa: Agreement in opacification between each ICM group and iodine concentration 1(0-0.3 mg ml-1): κ = 0.253 and 0.014 respectively, concentration 2(0.4-0.6 mg ml-1):κ =-0.017 and-0.005 respectively and concentration 3(0.7-1 mg ml-1):κ = 0.031 and 0.115 respectively. Conclusion: Nonionic dimer (Iodixanol) surpasses monomer (Iohexol) in quantitative image quality assessment by having lower image noise and higher CNR during CT. © 2020 IOP Publishing Ltd.
Description
Keywords
Algorithms, Blood vessels, Contrast media, Dimerization, Humans, Image processing, computer-assisted, Iodine, Iohexol, Macromolecular substances, Models, statistical, Phantoms, imaging, Radiographic image interpretation, computer-assisted, Signal-to-noise ratio, Tomography, x-ray computed, Triiodobenzoic acids, Computerized tomography, Cylinders (shapes), Grading, Image enhancement, Iterative methods, Monomers, Phantoms, Iodixanol, Contrast medium, Iodobenzoic acid derivative, Grading characteristics, Iodinated contrast medium, Noise ratio, Nonionic, Opacification, Quantitative images, Vessel size, Visual grading, Article, Blood vessel diameter, Comparative study, Computer assisted tomography, Concentration (parameter), Contrast to noise ratio, Evaluation study, Filtered back projection, Health care, Human, Hybrid iterative reconstruction, Image analysis, Image noise, Image quality, Image reconstruction, Imaging and display, Interrater reliability, Intrarater reliability, Model based iterative reconstruction, Noise, Qualitative analysis, Quantitative analysis, Simulation, Algorithm, Blood vessel, Chemistry, Computer assisted diagnosis, Diagnostic imaging, Image processing, Imaging phantom, Macromolecule, Procedures, Signal noise ratio, Statistical model, X-ray computed tomography, Dimers