PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American College of Physicians
Abstract
Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews. © 2018 American College of Physicians.
Description
Keywords
Checklist, Delphi technique, Humans, Meta-analysis as topic, Review literature as topic, Systematic reviews as topic, Adult, Consumer, Female, Health care personnel, Human, Male, Medical research, Nomenclature, Practice guideline, Review, Scientist, Systematic review, Delphi study, Literature, Meta analysis (topic)