PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation

dc.contributor.authorTricco, Andrea C.
dc.contributor.authorLillie, Erin
dc.contributor.authorZarin, Wasifa
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Kelly K.
dc.contributor.authorColquhoun, Heather L.
dc.contributor.authorLevac, Danielle Elaine
dc.contributor.authorMoher, David
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Micah D.J.
dc.contributor.authorHorsley, Tanya A.
dc.contributor.authorWeeks, Laura C.
dc.contributor.authorHempel, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorAkl, Elie A.
dc.contributor.authorChang, Christine S.
dc.contributor.authorMcGowan, Jessie L.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Lesley Anne
dc.contributor.authorHartling, Lisa A.
dc.contributor.authorAldcroft, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Michael G.
dc.contributor.authorGarritty, Chantelle M.
dc.contributor.authorLewin, Simon A.
dc.contributor.authorGodfrey, Christina M.
dc.contributor.authorMacdonald, Marilyn T.
dc.contributor.authorLanglois, Étienne V.
dc.contributor.authorSoares-Weiser, Karla V.
dc.contributor.authorMoriarty, Jo
dc.contributor.authorClifford, Tammy
dc.contributor.authorTunçalp, Özge
dc.contributor.authorStraus, Sharon E.
dc.contributor.departmentInternal Medicine
dc.contributor.facultyFaculty of Medicine (FM)
dc.contributor.institutionAmerican University of Beirut
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T11:53:37Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T11:53:37Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractScoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews. © 2018 American College of Physicians.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
dc.identifier.eid2-s2.0-85054287365
dc.identifier.pmid30178033
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10938/31119
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican College of Physicians
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Internal Medicine
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectChecklist
dc.subjectDelphi technique
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMeta-analysis as topic
dc.subjectReview literature as topic
dc.subjectSystematic reviews as topic
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectConsumer
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth care personnel
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMedical research
dc.subjectNomenclature
dc.subjectPractice guideline
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectScientist
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectDelphi study
dc.subjectLiterature
dc.subjectMeta analysis (topic)
dc.titlePRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation
dc.typeReview

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018-7992.pdf
Size:
284.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format