PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation
| dc.contributor.author | Tricco, Andrea C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lillie, Erin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zarin, Wasifa | |
| dc.contributor.author | O'Brien, Kelly K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Colquhoun, Heather L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Levac, Danielle Elaine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Moher, David | |
| dc.contributor.author | Peters, Micah D.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Horsley, Tanya A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Weeks, Laura C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hempel, Susanne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Akl, Elie A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chang, Christine S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | McGowan, Jessie L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stewart, Lesley Anne | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hartling, Lisa A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aldcroft, Adrian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wilson, Michael G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Garritty, Chantelle M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lewin, Simon A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Godfrey, Christina M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Macdonald, Marilyn T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Langlois, Étienne V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Soares-Weiser, Karla V. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Moriarty, Jo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Clifford, Tammy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tunçalp, Özge | |
| dc.contributor.author | Straus, Sharon E. | |
| dc.contributor.department | Internal Medicine | |
| dc.contributor.faculty | Faculty of Medicine (FM) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | American University of Beirut | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T11:53:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-24T11:53:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews. © 2018 American College of Physicians. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 | |
| dc.identifier.eid | 2-s2.0-85054287365 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 30178033 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10938/31119 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | American College of Physicians | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of Internal Medicine | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Checklist | |
| dc.subject | Delphi technique | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Meta-analysis as topic | |
| dc.subject | Review literature as topic | |
| dc.subject | Systematic reviews as topic | |
| dc.subject | Adult | |
| dc.subject | Consumer | |
| dc.subject | Female | |
| dc.subject | Health care personnel | |
| dc.subject | Human | |
| dc.subject | Male | |
| dc.subject | Medical research | |
| dc.subject | Nomenclature | |
| dc.subject | Practice guideline | |
| dc.subject | Review | |
| dc.subject | Scientist | |
| dc.subject | Systematic review | |
| dc.subject | Delphi study | |
| dc.subject | Literature | |
| dc.subject | Meta analysis (topic) | |
| dc.title | PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation | |
| dc.type | Review |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1